Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User Guide for from_file function #1047

Open
wants to merge 38 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

rajeeja
Copy link
Contributor

@rajeeja rajeeja commented Oct 29, 2024

Users guide for using from_file GRID function #946

@rajeeja rajeeja self-assigned this Oct 29, 2024
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@rajeeja rajeeja mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2024
@philipc2
Copy link
Member

Do you have any files from climate models or similar that you should showcase in this notebook? I'm not sure if showcasing the multipoly.shp is relevant to our users, as it isn't a proper grid.

@rajeeja
Copy link
Contributor Author

rajeeja commented Oct 29, 2024

Do you have any files from climate models or similar that you should showcase in this notebook? I'm not sure if showcasing the multipoly.shp is relevant to our users, as it isn't a proper grid.

yes, this PR is work in progress. I'll make it a draft.

@rajeeja rajeeja changed the title User Guide for from_file function DRAFT: User Guide for from_file function Oct 29, 2024
rajeeja and others added 22 commits October 31, 2024 15:14
o Remove the multipoly example, the old bug still exists, but that can be handled in issue #1048
@rajeeja
Copy link
Contributor Author

rajeeja commented Nov 12, 2024

@philipc2 Do you know why the docs are different than the actual notebook? You can compare on reviewNB, the notebook is different on the docs site.

Can you give the two links?

There's only a python version change here, right? :
docs/user-guide/from-points.ipynb

@aaronzedwick
Copy link
Member

@philipc2 Do you know why the docs are different than the actual notebook? You can compare on reviewNB, the notebook is different on the docs site.

Can you give the two links?

There's only a python version change here, right? : docs/user-guide/from-points.ipynb

That isn't the notebook I am talking about, I am looking at the from_file notebook. The bug is fixed now though.

@rajeeja rajeeja changed the title DRAFT: User Guide for from_file function User Guide for from_file function Nov 12, 2024
@rajeeja rajeeja marked this pull request as ready for review November 13, 2024 03:38
docs/userguide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/userguide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@philipc2
Copy link
Member

philipc2 commented Nov 18, 2024

image

What about the following title & description?

Title

Reading & Working with Geometry Files

Description

Load and work with geometry files (i.e. Shapefile, GeoJSON)

@rajeeja
Copy link
Contributor Author

rajeeja commented Nov 18, 2024

image

What about the following title & description?

Title

Reading & Working with Geometry Files

Description

Load and work with geometry files (i.e. Shapefile, GeoJSON)

Is GIS more accurate? (it's gray area as we may also call it geometry in the sense that they store spatial data, such as the shapes, boundaries, and locations of features on the Earth’s surface.

@philipc2
Copy link
Member

image
What about the following title & description?

Title

Reading & Working with Geometry Files

Description

Load and work with geometry files (i.e. Shapefile, GeoJSON)

Is GIS more accurate? (it's gray area as we may also call it geometry in the sense that they store spatial data, such as the shapes, boundaries, and locations of features on the Earth’s surface.

It might be a bit more accurate, but GIS seems pretty outside of the scope of our package.

@rajeeja
Copy link
Contributor Author

rajeeja commented Nov 27, 2024

image
What about the following title & description?

Title

Reading & Working with Geometry Files

Description

Load and work with geometry files (i.e. Shapefile, GeoJSON)

Is GIS more accurate? (it's gray area as we may also call it geometry in the sense that they store spatial data, such as the shapes, boundaries, and locations of features on the Earth’s surface.

It might be a bit more accurate, but GIS seems pretty outside of the scope of our package.

Ok, since we explicitly call the formats, I have changed it to geometry files "Shapefile, GeoJSON"

uxarray/grid/grid.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rajeeja rajeeja requested a review from aaronzedwick December 17, 2024 21:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants