-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TT-13421 create indexes on sharded sql pumps #861
Merged
Merged
Changes from 18 commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3bfba19
started to add indexes to shards
02be918
create indexes when SQL pump is sharded
a372054
added test for ensure index in SQL pump
1b36031
update sql aggregate to handle multiple indexes on sharded analytics
913eb63
update SQL aggregate test
44e8d11
isolate index build logic
6b993ff
some refactor
6cb4808
fixing test for indexes in SQL pump
593f372
gofmt sql_test.go
f088607
check drop table err
b061517
gofumpt
a859b54
ensuring table for SQL
d84594c
gofumpt
50602c3
refactoring ensureIndex in sql pump
85e5fe2
improve logging
7a9ebea
refactor logic while looping over indexes
b7acad8
Merge branch 'master' into TT-13421-create-indexes-on-sharded-sql-pumps
sredxny 618f2eb
gofumpt
f1919f2
only use the waitgroup for background
7d44007
rename variable to query and remove noisy log
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A better naming for this variable could be
query
, what do you think?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In addition to this, let's bring in practise to be careful when forming SQL queries. I know the values in this query are totally under our control (consts), but still I feel like it's better to use an sql builder. https://gorm.io/docs/sql_builder.html - this might help
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Renamed.... @jeffy-mathew in such case we would need to add some logic like:
As the original query contains a param "option" that can be "concunrrently" or empty, and db.Raw method doesnt allows it and will mark it as bad query