Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase atol on specific tests for x86 #2449

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

Increase atol on specific tests for x86 #2449

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

penelopeysm
Copy link
Member

Assuming we can't fix #2446 immediately, this will at least stop CI from failing.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.39%. Comparing base (25d2023) to head (2a68956).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2449   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.39%   85.39%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines        1588     1588           
=======================================
  Hits         1356     1356           
  Misses        232      232           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 20, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12424736024

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 76.865%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 12411420069: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1216
Relevant Lines: 1582

💛 - Coveralls

@yebai
Copy link
Member

yebai commented Dec 20, 2024

Thanks @penelopeysm!

@yebai yebai merged commit 1c60b7a into master Dec 20, 2024
62 checks passed
@yebai yebai deleted the py/increase-x86-atol branch December 20, 2024 16:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reproducibility of particle Gibbs is not guaranteed on x86
3 participants