-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MEDIUM CODE RUB: Upgrade to The Standard 2.10.3 #33
Conversation
...vices/Foundations/DependenciesInjections/DependencyInjectionServiceTests.Logic.GetService.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...dations/DependenciesInjections/DependencyInjectionServiceTests.Logic.BuildServiceProvider.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pendenciesInjections/DependencyInjectionServiceTests.Exceptions.RegisterServiceDescriptor.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pendenciesInjections/DependencyInjectionServiceTests.Exceptions.RegisterServiceDescriptor.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...e.Tests.Unit/Services/Foundations/Assemblies/AssemblyServiceTests.Validations.GetAssembly.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../Services/Foundations/Assemblies/AssemblyServiceTests.Logic.GetApplicationPathsAssemblies.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...re.Tests.Unit/Services/Foundations/Assemblies/AssemblyServiceTests.Exceptions.GetAssembly.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...re.Tests.Unit/Services/Foundations/Assemblies/AssemblyServiceTests.Exceptions.GetAssembly.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...re.Tests.Unit/Services/Foundations/Assemblies/AssemblyServiceTests.Exceptions.GetAssembly.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@LBoullosa is it your opinion that we do not need to ValueTask the two service exception partial classes? meaning the...
=>
then ValueTask this method as well. |
I don´t see it is neccesary. It´s like the inner validations methods which was reverted from using async in the last session. |
closes #32