Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relocate ExtraMarkups sources from GitLab to GitHub. #1986

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

chir-set
Copy link
Contributor

@chir-set chir-set commented Dec 1, 2023

New extension

  • Extension has a reasonable name (not too general, not too narrow, suggests what the extension is for)
  • Repository name is Slicer+ExtensionName
  • Repository is associated with 3d-slicer-extension GitHub topic so that it is listed here. To edit topics, click the settings icon in the right side of "About" section header and enter 3d-slicer-extension in "Topics" and click "Save changes". To learn more about topics, read https://help.github.com/en/articles/about-topics
  • Extension description summarizes in 1-2 sentences what the extension is usable (should be understandable for non-experts)
  • Any known related patents must be mentioned in the extension description.
  • LICENSE.txt is present in the repository root. MIT (https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/) or Apache (https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/) license is recommended. If source code license is more restrictive for users than MIT, BSD, Apache, or 3D Slicer license then the name of the used license must be mentioned in the extension description.
  • Extension URL and revision (scmurl, scmrevision) is correct, consider using a branch name (main, release, ...) instead of a specific git hash to avoid re-submitting pull request whenever the extension is updated
  • Extension icon URL is correct (do not use the icon's webpage but the raw data download URL that you get from the download button - it should look something like this: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/user/repo/main/SomeIcon.png)
  • Screenshot URLs (screenshoturls) are correct, contains at least one
  • Homepage URL points to valid webpage containing the following:
    • Extension name
    • Short description: 1-2 sentences, which summarizes what the extension is usable for
    • At least one nice, informative image, that illustrates what the extension can do. It may be a screenshot.
    • Description of contained modules: at one sentence for each module
    • Tutorial: step-by-step description of at least the most typical use case, include a few screenshots, provide download links to sample input data set
    • Publication: link to publication and/or to PubMed reference (if available)
    • License: We suggest you use a permissive license that includes patent and contribution clauses. This will help protect developers and ensure the code remains freely available. We suggest you use the Slicer License or the Apache 2.0. Always mention in your README file the license you have chosen. If you choose a different license, explain why to the extension maintainers. Depending on the license we may not be able to host your work. Read here to learn more about licenses.
    • Content of submitted s4ext file is consistent with the top-level CMakeLists.txt file in the repository (description, URLs, dependencies, etc. are the same)
  • Hide unused features in the repository to reduce noise/irrelevant information:
    • Click Settings and in repository settings uncheck Wiki, Projects, and Discussions (if they are currently not used)
    • Click the settings icon next to About in the top-right corner of the repository main page and uncheck Releases and Packages (if they are currently not used)

@chir-set
Copy link
Contributor Author

chir-set commented Dec 3, 2023

I just noted that this PR pulls from chir-set:5.6 and not from chir-set:main, while requesting a commit in Slicer:main.

This happened by inattention. Is it a blocking mismatch? The files in my branches are identical.

@jcfr jcfr changed the title Relocate ExtraMarkups source on github. Relocate ExtraMarkups sources from GitLab to GitHub. Jan 9, 2024
@jcfr
Copy link
Member

jcfr commented Jan 9, 2024

Closing. This is superseded by #1993

Once the new pull-request is integrated, consider submitting an other one updating the screenshot.

@jcfr jcfr closed this Jan 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants