Correction for cell_IDs #2
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thank you for sharing all the information. I was able to reproduce the exact results using your Matlab scripts but couldn't reproduce them in my R implementation. I noticed a mistake in your scripts:
Cell_Ids = txt(1,2:end);
The Cell_Ids are shifted, which affects the subsetting by conditions (d0, d3, and d9). The resulting clusters are quite different after correcting this mistake. I observed 2 distinct clusters instead of 3 and memberships are different with the ARI index (~0.25).
Correction:
Cell_Ids = txt(1,1:end);
Best regards,
Enes
@nslavov