Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix[SqlAlchemy]: temporary downgrade sqlalchemy version to support al… #585

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 22, 2023

Conversation

ArslanSaleem
Copy link
Collaborator

Downgrade SqlAlchemy version to support all connectors

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 21, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #585 (b0a1ddc) into main (325fed6) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #585   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.89%   83.89%           
=======================================
  Files          55       55           
  Lines        2689     2689           
=======================================
  Hits         2256     2256           
  Misses        433      433           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

pyproject.toml Outdated
@@ -50,9 +50,11 @@ coverage = "^7.2.7"

[tool.poetry.group.extras.dependencies]
google-cloud-aiplatform = "^1.26.1"
sqlalchemy-databricks = "^0.2.0"
snowflake-sqlalchemy = "^1.5.0"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ArslanSaleem Why are these in the extras and how do the final user installs these?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, beware that sqlalchemy-databricks has been deprecated a while ago (see here).

Copy link
Collaborator

@gventuri gventuri Sep 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mspronesti thanks for reporting. I think that's the reason of the downgrade, but if an alternative is available we should definitely switch to that.

@ArslanSaleem here's the maintained version, I'll open a issue for that:
https://github.com/databricks/databricks-sql-python

@gventuri gventuri merged commit 57c5259 into main Sep 22, 2023
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants