Release 6.0.0 notes #2664
Release 6.0.0 notes #2664
Conversation
| * @gdrosos made their first contribution in https://github.com/SasView/sasview/pull/2585 | ||
| * @astellhorn made their first contribution in https://github.com/SasView/sasview/pull/2610 | ||
|
|
||
| **Full Changelog**: https://github.com/SasView/sasview/compare/nightly-build...v6.0.0-alpha |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this full changelog URL compare 5.0.6 to 6.0.0-alpha? Comparing to the nightly-build tag (which was tagged at some point during codecamp Oct 2022, from what I can see) doesn't seem right.
I suspect there's also a stack of PRs that aren't listed in the What's Changed section, perhaps because they were merged prior to the nightly-build tag but after the branch point for release_5.0.6? (I've not looked in detail, but I think all the stuff I was doing in late 2022 wasn't destined for 5.0.6 but was held over for 6.0.0 and isn't listed there)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, the notes themself need to be worked on. This is more of the template. The main point of this is that release notes disappear every time someone pushes to the branch, so this is mostly to prevent empty records on this page: https://github.com/SasView/sasview/releases/tag/v6.0.0-alpha
butlerpd
added
the
Discuss At The Call
Description
This PR addresses two issues related to continuous integration for release_6.0: 1) It uses GH action that allows notarization with notarytool (compare to atool that won't be supported fron Nov 1st). 2) It automatically uploads release notes (so they don't disappear when upload action is pushed). We will need to make a decision whether this right approach for keeping GH release notes in the future. (One can still edit release page on GH and this file won't be aware of it).
How Has This Been Tested?
Installed sasview from installer file and checked if it runs (and if it is signed)
Review Checklist (please remove items if they don't apply):