Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed typos, S(Q) calc verified with Bergström 1999 #619

Merged

Conversation

olihammond
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@olihammond olihammond linked an issue Jan 9, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Member

@butlerpd butlerpd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This corrects the error which now matches the code as suggested by the person reporting the problem and apparently also matches the paper.

However, since we are changing the model, I wonder if it would be appropriate (or even possible) to add this to the paracrystal category as well? This however probably needs more discussion with a larger group so maybe not in time for 6.0.1? Otherwise this is ready to merge. I am marking it as approved

@butlerpd butlerpd merged commit 654f629 into master Jan 17, 2025
18 checks passed
@butlerpd butlerpd deleted the 617-documentation-error-for-lamellar_stack_paracrystal-model branch January 17, 2025 20:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Documentation error for lamellar_stack_paracrystal model
3 participants