Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scimono jakarta branch next dev #238

Merged

Conversation

hborisov
Copy link
Member

@hborisov hborisov commented Aug 6, 2024

No description provided.

davidsarosap and others added 6 commits March 1, 2024 11:33
SAP#232)

Passing filter query param to the callbacks for Users/<PK> and
Groups/<PK>

(cherry picked from commit b743083)
The word "Default" in the "DefaultSchemasCallback.java" let me assume
that I can derive classes from it to implement some method which are
needed in my use case. The fact that getAttribute is overridden in the
DefaultSchemasCallback.java leads to confusion and makes it even harder
to make it work with a derived class.
I think it is better to just let the default method in the interface
shining through.

Co-authored-by: Hristo Borisov <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 81fd5ff)
I think there are some deps which are only needed in test context.

Co-authored-by: Hristo Borisov <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit d2d2f61)
The custom schema is not only accepting custom schemas, it is accepting
any syntactic valid schema.
That's why [these
lines](https://github.com/SAP/scimono/blob/adebc03c26dbda55366849a477b4bcfb26e574e2/scimono-server/src/main/java/com/sap/scimono/callback/schemas/SchemasCallback.java#L37-L44)
are effecting that every syntactic valid schema is handled like a custom
schema. Core schemas will not be found.

In my understanding the core schemas are not custom schemas.

---------

Co-authored-by: Hristo Borisov <[email protected]>

(cherry picked from commit 5fcbc9a)
@hborisov hborisov requested a review from parvandobrev August 6, 2024 11:26
@hborisov hborisov merged commit 57278d0 into SAP:scimono-jakarta-branch Aug 6, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants