Support backbone.model as ws resource #1369
Conversation
I had assumed this worked already
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the WebSocket service in both its implementation ( Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Service as WebSocket Service
participant Resources as _getResources
participant Subscription as Subscription Handler
Service->>Resources: Normalize resources
Resources-->>Service: Standardized resource array
Service->>Subscription: Process subscription
Subscription-->>Service: Confirm subscription
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/js/services/ws.cy.js (2)
1-1: LGTM with a minor suggestionThe addition of Backbone import and TestModel definition properly supports testing with Backbone models.
Consider moving the TestModel definition to the top of the test file or to a separate test helpers file for better organization:
import Backbone from 'backbone'; import Radio from 'backbone.radio'; import WSService from './ws'; +const TestModel = Backbone.Model.extend({ type: 'bar' }); let service; const clientKey = 'clientKey';Also applies to: 150-151
152-152: LGTM with a documentation suggestionThe test properly verifies Backbone.Model support.
Consider adding a comment to explain the test's intention:
+ // Verify that the service handles Backbone.Model instances and only uses id/type properties channel.request('subscribe', new TestModel({ id: 'foo', foo: true }));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/js/services/ws.cy.js(3 hunks)src/js/services/ws.js(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/js/services/ws.js (4)
1-1: LGTM!
The addition of map from underscore is appropriate for the new resource processing functionality.
120-122: LGTM!
The integration of _getResources standardizes resource processing while maintaining the existing persistence behavior.
152-153: LGTM!
The use of _getResources here maintains consistency with other methods.
114-118: Verify that stripping properties other than 'id' and 'type' is intentional
The _getResources method only extracts id and type properties from resources. While this standardizes the format, it might unintentionally drop other important properties that could be needed for WebSocket operations.
Consider documenting this behavior in a comment to make it explicit:
_getResources(resources) {
resources = isArray(resources) ? resources : [resources];
+ // Only id and type properties are used for WebSocket subscriptions
return map(resources, ({ id, type }) => ({ id, type }));
},✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the WebSocket message payloads and resource handling.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough context about how resources and WebSocket messages are handled in the codebase:
Stripping properties to id and type is intentional and correct for WebSocket subscriptions
The _getResources method correctly extracts only id and type properties as these are the only required fields for WebSocket subscriptions. This is verified by:
- The WebSocket message handling in
src/js/services/ws.jsonly uses these properties to look up and instantiate resources:
const Resource = Store.get(data.resource.type);
const resource = new Resource({ id: data.resource.id });-
The subscription data structure throughout the codebase consistently uses just
idandtypefor resource references, as seen in multiple entity implementations. -
The actual resource data comes through the WebSocket messages themselves, not the subscription payload.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for WebSocket message handling to verify if other properties are needed
rg -A 5 "handleMessage|onMessage" --type js
Length of output: 2563
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for WebSocket resource handling and subscription patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'handleMessage({ $$$, payload }) { $$$ }'
# Look for WebSocket message construction
rg -A 3 "send\(" --type js
# Check resource-related WebSocket operations
rg -B 2 -A 2 "type|id.*resource" --type js
Length of output: 69009
RoundingWell Care Ops Frontend
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
RoundingWell Care Ops Frontend
|
| Branch Review |
websocket-resource
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 02m 48s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Paul Falgout |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
1
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
312
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build c247d69a-2b9c-4ed0-bb38-0abba7c0b69aDetails
💛 - Coveralls |
I had assumed this worked already
Shortcut Story ID: [sc-###]
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
subscribe,add, andunsubscribemethods to reduce redundancy and improve clarity.