Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update workos authkit #1359

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024
Merged

Update workos authkit #1359

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

paulfalgout
Copy link
Member

@paulfalgout paulfalgout commented Dec 4, 2024

Includes workos/authkit-js#52

Shortcut Story ID: [sc-56720]

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the @workos-inc/authkit-js dependency to the latest version for improved functionality and security.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves a single change to the package.json file, specifically updating the version of the @workos-inc/authkit-js dependency from ^0.5.1 to ^0.7.1. No other modifications were made to dependencies, scripts, or configurations within the file.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Updated dependency version: @workos-inc/authkit-js from ^0.5.1 to ^0.7.1

Possibly related PRs

  • Add workos POC implementation #1325: This PR adds the @workos-inc/authkit-js dependency in package.json, which is directly related to the version update of the same dependency in the main PR.
  • Return token from the get #1329: This PR modifies the getToken function in src/js/auth.js, which is relevant as it may interact with the authentication logic that the updated @workos-inc/authkit-js dependency supports.

Suggested reviewers

  • nmajor25

🐇 In the garden, I hop with glee,
A version change, oh joy for me!
From 0.5 to 0.7 we leap,
New features in the code we keep.
With every update, we grow so bright,
Hopping forward, coding through the night! 🌙✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01c416e and b538432.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

225-225: Verify WorkOS AuthKit upgrade implications

The update from ^0.5.1 to ^0.7.1 spans multiple minor versions in a pre-1.0 package, which could potentially include breaking changes despite being a minor version bump.

Let's check the changelog and potential impacts:

Consider:

  1. Review the auth provider integration strategy as multiple auth libraries are present
  2. Document which auth provider is used in which scenario
  3. Ensure proper error handling for auth provider transitions

Would you like help with:

  1. Testing the auth flows with the updated version?
  2. Creating integration tests for auth scenarios?
  3. Documenting the auth provider strategy?
✅ Verification successful

Let's examine the WorkOS integration more closely to understand the impact of this version update.

The previous results showed:

  1. We couldn't fetch the changelog directly from GitHub
  2. The codebase has separate auth provider implementations
  3. WorkOS integration is isolated in src/js/auth/workos.js

Let's analyze the implementation details to understand the potential impact of this update.


Let's check the configuration and usage to fully understand the integration:

From the previous results, we can see:

  1. The WorkOS implementation is modular and well-isolated
  2. It uses basic AuthKit features: signIn, signOut, getUser, getAccessToken
  3. No advanced or deprecated features are used
  4. The implementation is straightforward and follows standard patterns

Let's examine the configuration and usage patterns to ensure compatibility.


WorkOS AuthKit update appears safe to proceed

The implementation uses only stable core features of the AuthKit SDK:

  • Basic authentication flow: signIn, signOut, getUser, getAccessToken
  • Standard client initialization with createClient
  • Simple configuration without advanced features

The auth implementation is well-isolated:

  • Modular auth provider system with clear priority order
  • WorkOS-specific code contained in src/js/auth/workos.js
  • Clean separation of configuration in appconfig.json

Note: While the version jump from 0.5.1 to 0.7.1 is significant, the implementation's simplicity and use of core features suggests minimal risk. The auth system's modular design also provides a safety net, as other providers (Auth0, Kinde) are available as fallbacks.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze the WorkOS AuthKit upgrade

# Check for breaking changes in releases
gh api repos/workos-inc/authkit/releases -q '.[] | select(.tag_name | contains("v0.6") or contains("v0.7")) | {tag: .tag_name, body: .body}'

# Look for auth-related files that might need updates
rg -l --type js "workos.*authkit" 

# Check for coexistence patterns with other auth providers
rg -l --type js "@auth0/auth0-spa-js|@kinde-oss/kinde-auth-pkce-js|@workos-inc/authkit-js"

Length of output: 503


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check WorkOS auth implementation
cat src/js/auth/workos.js

# Look for any WorkOS-specific configuration or setup
rg -l "workos" --type=json --type=js

# Check for any WorkOS-specific environment variables
rg -l "WORKOS" --type=env --type=js

Length of output: 2923


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check WorkOS configuration
cat src/js/config.js

# Check main auth implementation
cat src/js/auth.js

# Check the app configuration
cat public/appconfig.json

# Look for WorkOS client usage
rg -A 3 "createClient|authkit\." --type js

Length of output: 4393


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@paulfalgout paulfalgout requested a review from nmajor25 December 4, 2024 09:47
Copy link

cypress bot commented Dec 4, 2024

RoundingWell Care Ops Frontend    Run #7016

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #7016  •  git commit b5384324bb: Update workos authkit
Project RoundingWell Care Ops Frontend
Branch Review workos-update
Run status status check passed Passed #7016
Run duration 03m 01s
Commit git commit b5384324bb: Update workos authkit
Committer Paul Falgout
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 2
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 312
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build b27d046f-b03e-41a1-88ad-ca960ef5b0d1

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 99.936%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 202f29c9-9bb8-42c3-a754-23e79770413b: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 6047
Relevant Lines: 6047

💛 - Coveralls

@paulfalgout paulfalgout merged commit 559e5d3 into develop Dec 5, 2024
6 checks passed
@paulfalgout paulfalgout deleted the workos-update branch December 5, 2024 15:35
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants