Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ATO-1315] Flows yaml schema #12901
[ATO-1315] Flows yaml schema #12901
Changes from 20 commits
92a0e24
9cb1b04
06839c5
3a04dd8
bb4f625
e628f4b
994ec5f
d966b24
f685d8e
01372e6
2175ab6
6351f72
f5f65dd
5a3bf1c
6627fb7
47c596c
bfea853
cddceab
226d193
8aebb5f
9492b81
a49870d
dbde8bf
da63faf
54e613f
2448325
cd07f27
61a9891
5b21911
72d50dc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just double-checking if this is still in use yet, or if it's been discarded, i thought we removed the need for steps of type user message, unless this is something different and related to coexistence?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added because of the flow spec specifically
3. Flow Rules
3rd point it's not used anywhere (that I found) same withnlu_trigger
maybe they are used for same thing...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, yeah I was also under the impression that we don't use the
intent
step any longer, butnlu_trigger
might be useful in coexistence. Best to check with Daksh/Engine on Slack if this part of the schema is correct.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes we use
nlu_trigger
now. Although that property hasn't been implemented yet. @twerkmeister would know the implementation details of this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the clarification @dakshvar22 removed the
intent
step from the schema, thenlu_trigger
is already part of the schema here (structure is the same as in the flows spec)This file was deleted.