deploy: d5980f0

QubitPi · Jul 24, 2024 · c748834 · c748834
1 parent ab505a9
commit c748834
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 52 changed files with 168 additions and 32 deletions.
diff --git a/_astro/_category_.C8o5YOhv.css b/_astro/_category_.C8o5YOhv.css
diff --git a/_astro/_category_.DIagfFno.css b/_astro/_category_.DIagfFno.css
diff --git a/_astro/_page_.CiRCMsaA.css b/_astro/_page_.CiRCMsaA.css
diff --git a/_astro/_page_.Chg2XYvj.css → _astro/_page_.fevZk8Se.css b/_astro/_page_.Chg2XYvj.css → _astro/_page_.fevZk8Se.css
diff --git a/_astro/_page_.ptozhpvU.css b/_astro/_page_.ptozhpvU.css
diff --git a/_astro/about.ucm8Isf5.css → _astro/about.214WUibn.css b/_astro/about.ucm8Isf5.css → _astro/about.214WUibn.css
diff --git a/_astro/cover.BaWXqzxI.png b/_astro/cover.BaWXqzxI.png
diff --git a/_astro/cover.BaWXqzxI_VLpYI.webp b/_astro/cover.BaWXqzxI_VLpYI.webp
diff --git a/_astro/cover.w7D32gFc_Z6zHnH.webp b/_astro/cover.w7D32gFc_Z6zHnH.webp
diff --git a/_astro/easter-roman-empire.1Hr2ftP4.png b/_astro/easter-roman-empire.1Hr2ftP4.png
diff --git a/_astro/easter-roman-empire.1Hr2ftP4_Z1eWvIM.webp b/_astro/easter-roman-empire.1Hr2ftP4_Z1eWvIM.webp
diff --git a/_astro/pechenegs.DlaUv7p7.png b/_astro/pechenegs.DlaUv7p7.png
diff --git a/_astro/pechenegs.DlaUv7p7_Zscz0Y.webp b/_astro/pechenegs.DlaUv7p7_Zscz0Y.webp
diff --git a/about/index.html b/about/index.html
diff --git a/archive/category/Examples/index.html b/archive/category/Examples/index.html
diff --git a/archive/category/Guides/index.html b/archive/category/Guides/index.html
diff --git a/archive/category/Management/index.html b/archive/category/Management/index.html
diff --git a/archive/category/Theory/index.html b/archive/category/Theory/index.html
diff --git a/archive/category/uncategorized/index.html b/archive/category/uncategorized/index.html
diff --git a/archive/index.html b/archive/index.html
diff --git a/archive/tag/Blogging/index.html b/archive/tag/Blogging/index.html
diff --git a/archive/tag/Customization/index.html b/archive/tag/Customization/index.html
diff --git a/archive/tag/Demo/index.html b/archive/tag/Demo/index.html
diff --git a/archive/tag/Example/index.html b/archive/tag/Example/index.html
diff --git a/archive/tag/Fuwari/index.html b/archive/tag/Fuwari/index.html
diff --git a/archive/tag/Management/index.html b/archive/tag/Management/index.html
diff --git a/archive/tag/Markdown/index.html b/archive/tag/Markdown/index.html
diff --git a/archive/tag/Technologies/index.html b/archive/tag/Technologies/index.html
diff --git a/archive/tag/Theory/index.html b/archive/tag/Theory/index.html
diff --git a/archive/tag/Video/index.html b/archive/tag/Video/index.html
diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
diff --git a/pagefind/fragment/en_1cbfe63.pf_fragment b/pagefind/fragment/en_1cbfe63.pf_fragment
diff --git a/pagefind/fragment/en_6d96fee.pf_fragment b/pagefind/fragment/en_6d96fee.pf_fragment
diff --git a/pagefind/fragment/en_72454b2.pf_fragment b/pagefind/fragment/en_72454b2.pf_fragment
diff --git a/pagefind/fragment/en_9d72f72.pf_fragment b/pagefind/fragment/en_9d72f72.pf_fragment
diff --git a/pagefind/fragment/en_a92762a.pf_fragment b/pagefind/fragment/en_a92762a.pf_fragment
diff --git a/pagefind/fragment/en_b850dbf.pf_fragment b/pagefind/fragment/en_b850dbf.pf_fragment
diff --git a/pagefind/index/en_ac7c7f3.pf_index b/pagefind/index/en_ac7c7f3.pf_index
diff --git a/pagefind/index/en_e47dcf2.pf_index b/pagefind/index/en_e47dcf2.pf_index
diff --git a/pagefind/pagefind-entry.json b/pagefind/pagefind-entry.json
@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"version":"1.1.0","languages":{"en":{"hash":"en_99cfa7c965","wasm":"en","page_count":8}}}
+{"version":"1.1.0","languages":{"en":{"hash":"en_3269bca3a4","wasm":"en","page_count":8}}}
diff --git a/pagefind/pagefind.en_3269bca3a4.pf_meta b/pagefind/pagefind.en_3269bca3a4.pf_meta
diff --git a/pagefind/pagefind.en_99cfa7c965.pf_meta b/pagefind/pagefind.en_99cfa7c965.pf_meta
diff --git a/posts/guide/index.html b/posts/guide/index.html
diff --git a/posts/history-of-management/index.html b/posts/history-of-management/index.html
diff --git a/posts/kant-view-of-mind-and-consciousness/index.html b/posts/kant-view-of-mind-and-consciousness/index.html
diff --git a/posts/managing-tech-assets-common-lib-or-not/index.html b/posts/managing-tech-assets-common-lib-or-not/index.html
diff --git a/posts/markdown-extended/index.html b/posts/markdown-extended/index.html
diff --git a/posts/markdown/index.html b/posts/markdown/index.html
diff --git a/posts/reading-notes-de-administrando-imperio/index.html b/posts/reading-notes-de-administrando-imperio/index.html
diff --git a/posts/video/index.html b/posts/video/index.html
diff --git a/rss.xml b/rss.xml
@@ -126,6 +126,140 @@ up for an example to be copied, and after their pattern to strive himself also t
 greatly advantage you… [to know] the difference between other nations, their origins and customs and manner of life, and
 the position and climate of the land they dwell in...
 :::&lt;/p&gt;
+</content:encoded></item><item><title>Kant&apos;s View of the Mind and Consciousness of Self</title><link>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/kant-view-of-mind-and-consciousness/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/kant-view-of-mind-and-consciousness/</guid><description>Kant&apos;s View of the Mind and Consciousness of Self</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;blockquote&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Brook, Andrew and Julian Wuerth,
+&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/kant-mind&quot;&gt;Kant&apos;s View of the Mind and Consciousness of Self&lt;/a&gt;&quot;,
+The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta &amp;amp; Uri Nodelman (eds.)&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/blockquote&gt;
+&lt;h2&gt;A Sketch of Kant&apos;s View of the Mind&lt;/h2&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;In general structure, Kant&apos;s model of the mind was the dominant model in the empirical psychology that flowed from his
+work and then again, after a hiatus during which behaviourism reigned supreme (roughly 1910 to 1965), toward the end of
+the 20th century, especially in cognitive science. Central elements of the models of the mind of thinkers otherwise as
+different as Sigmund Freud and Jerry Fodor are broadly Kantian, for example.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Three ideas define the basic shape (&apos;cognitive architecture&apos;) of Kant&apos;s model and one its dominant method. They have all
+become part of the foundation of cognitive science.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;ol&gt;
+&lt;li&gt;The mind is a complex set of abilities (functions). (As Meerbote 1989 and many others have observed, Kant held a
+functionalist view of the mind almost 200 years before functionalism was officially articulated in the 1960s by
+Hilary Putnam and others.)&lt;/li&gt;
+&lt;li&gt;The functions crucial for mental, knowledge-generating activity are spatio-temporal processing of, and application of
+concepts to, sensory inputs. Cognition requires concepts as well as percepts.&lt;/li&gt;
+&lt;li&gt;These functions are forms of what Kant called synthesis. Synthesis (and the unity in consciousness required for
+synthesis) are central to cognition.&lt;/li&gt;
+&lt;/ol&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;These three ideas are fundamental to most thinking about cognition now. Kant&apos;s most important method, the transcendental
+method, is also at the heart of contemporary cognitive science.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;ul&gt;
+&lt;li&gt;To study the mind, infer the conditions necessary for experience. Arguments having this structure are called
+&lt;em&gt;transcendental arguments&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;
+&lt;/ul&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;:::tip
+Translated into contemporary terms, the core of this method is inference to the best explanation, the method of
+postulating unobservable mental mechanisms in order to explain observed behaviour.
+:::&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;To be sure, Kant thought that he could get more out of his transcendental arguments than just &apos;best explanations&apos;. He
+thought that he could get &lt;em&gt;a priori&lt;/em&gt; (experience independent) knowledge out of them. Kant had a tripartite doctrine of
+the &lt;em&gt;a priori&lt;/em&gt;. He held that some features of the mind and its knowledge had &lt;em&gt;a priori&lt;/em&gt; origins, i.e., must be in the
+mind prior to experience (because using them is necessary to have experience). That mind and knowledge have these
+features are &lt;em&gt;a priori&lt;/em&gt; truths, i.e., necessary and universal. And we can come to know these truths, or that they are
+&lt;em&gt;a priori&lt;/em&gt; at any rate, only by using &lt;em&gt;a priori&lt;/em&gt; methods, i.e., we cannot learn these things from experience (B3) (Brook
+1993). Kant thought that transcendental arguments were &lt;em&gt;a priori&lt;/em&gt; or yielded the &lt;em&gt;a priori&lt;/em&gt; in all three ways.
+Nonetheless, at the heart of this method is inference to the best explanation. When introspection fell out of favour
+about 100 years ago, the alternative approach adopted was exactly this approach. Its nonempirical roots in Kant
+notwithstanding, it is now the major method used by experimental cognitive scientists.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;:::important
+Other topics equally central to Kant&apos;s approach to the mind have hardly been discussed by cognitive science. These
+include a kind of synthesis that for Kant was essential to minds like ours and what struck him as the most striking
+features of consciousness of self. Far from his model having been superseded by cognitive science, some things central
+to the model have not even been assimilated by it.
+:::&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;h2&gt;Kant&apos;s Critical Project and How the Mind Fits Into It&lt;/h2&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;The major works so far as Kant&apos;s views on the mind are concerned are the monumental &lt;em&gt;Critique of Pure Reason (CPR)&lt;/em&gt; and
+his little, late &lt;em&gt;Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View&lt;/em&gt;, first published in 1798 only six years before his death.
+Kant&apos;s view of the mind arose from his
+&lt;a href=&quot;https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-development/&quot;&gt;general philosophical project&lt;/a&gt; in CPR the following way. Kant
+aimed among other things to,&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;ul&gt;
+&lt;li&gt;Justify our conviction that physics, like mathematics, is a body of necessary and universal truth.&lt;/li&gt;
+&lt;li&gt;Insulate religion, including belief in immortality, and free will from the corrosive effects of this very same
+science.&lt;/li&gt;
+&lt;/ul&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Kant accepted without reservation that “God, freedom and immortality” (1781/7, Bxxx) exist but feared that, if science
+were relevant to their existence at all, it would provide reasons to doubt that they exist. As he saw it and very
+fortunately, science cannot touch these questions. “I have found it necessary to deny &lt;em&gt;knowledge&lt;/em&gt;, ... in order to make
+room for faith.” (Bxxx, his italics).&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Laying the foundation for pursuit of the first aim, which as he saw it was no less than the aim of showing why physics
+is a science, was what led Kant to his views about how the mind works. He approached the grounding of physics by asking:
+What are the necessary conditions of experience? Put simply, he held that for our experience, and therefore our minds,
+to be as they are, the way that our experience is tied together must reflect the way that, according to physics, says
+objects in the world must be tied together. Seeing this connection also tells us a lot about what our minds must be
+like.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;In pursuit of the second aim, Kant criticized some arguments of his predecessors that entailed if sound that we can know
+more about the mind&apos;s consciousness of itself than Kant could allow. Mounting these criticisms led him to some
+extraordinarily penetrating ideas about our consciousness of ourselves.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;In CPR, Kant discussed the mind only in connection with his main projects, never in its own right, so his treatment is
+remarkably scattered and sketchy. As he put it, “Enquiry … [into] the pure understanding itself, its possibility and the
+cognitive faculties upon which it rests ... is of great importance for my chief purpose, ... [but] does not form an
+essential part of it” (Axvii). Indeed, Kant offers no sustained, focussed discussion of the mind anywhere in his work
+except the popular &lt;em&gt;Anthropology&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;In addition, the two chapters of CPR in which most of Kant&apos;s remarks on the mind occur, the chapter on the
+Transcendental Deduction (TD) and the chapter on what he called Paralogisms (faulty arguments about the mind mounted by
+his predecessors) were the two chapters that gave him the greatest difficulty. (They contain some of the most
+impenetrable prose ever written.) Kant completely rewrote the main body of both chapters for the second edition
+(though not the introductions, interestingly).&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;In the two editions of CPR, there are seven main discussions of the mind. The first is in the Transcendental Aesthetic,
+the second is in what is usually called the Metaphysical Deduction. Then there are two discussions of it in the
+first-edition TD, in parts 1 to 3 of Section 2 and in the whole of Section 3 and two more in the second-edition TD. The
+seventh and last is found in the first edition version of Kant&apos;s attack on the Paralogisms, in the course of which he
+says things of the utmost interest about consciousness of and reference to self. (What little was retained of these
+remarks in the second edition was moved to the completely rewritten TD.) For understanding Kant on the mind and
+self-knowledge, the first edition of CPR is far more valuable than the second edition. Kant&apos;s discussion proceeds
+through the following stages.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;h3&gt;Transcendental Aesthetic&lt;/h3&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Kant calls the first stage the Transcendental Aesthetic. It is about what space and time must be like, and how we must
+handle them, if our experience is to have the spatial and temporal properties that it has. This question about the
+necessary conditions of experience is for Kant a &apos;transcendental&apos; question and the strategy of proceeding by trying to
+find answers to such questions is, as we said, the strategy of transcendental argument.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Here Kant advances one of his most notorious views: that whatever it is that impinges on us from the mind-independent
+world does not come located in a spatial nor even a temporal matrix (A37=B54fn.). Rather, it is the mind that organizes
+this &apos;manifold of raw intuition&apos;, as he called it, spatially and temporally. The mind has two pure forms of intuition,
+space and time, built into it to allow it to do so. (&apos;Pure&apos; means &apos;not derived from experience&apos;.)&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;h3&gt;Metaphysical Deduction&lt;/h3&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;The Aesthetic is about the conditions of experience, Kant&apos;s official project. The chapter leading up to the
+Transcendental Deduction, The Clue to the Discovery of All Pure Concepts of the Understanding has a very different
+starting point.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Starting from Aristotelian logic (the syllogisms and the formal concepts that Aristotle called &lt;em&gt;categories&lt;/em&gt;), Kant
+proceeds by analysis to draw out the implications of these concepts and syllogisms for the conceptual structure (the
+“function of thought in judgment”) within which all thought and experience must take place. The result is what Kant
+called the Categories. That is to say, Kant tries to deduce the conceptual structure of experience from the components
+of Aristotelian logic.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thus, in Kant&apos;s thought about the mind early in CPR, there is not one central movement but two, one in the
+Transcendental Aesthetic and the other in the Metaphysical Deduction. The first is a move up from experience (of
+objects) to the necessary conditions of such experience. The second is a move down from the Aristotelian functions of
+judgment to the concepts that we have to use in judging, namely, the Categories. One is inference up from experience,
+the other deduction down from conceptual structures of the most abstract kind.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;h3&gt;Transcendental Deduction, 1st Edition&lt;/h3&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;Then we get to the second chapter of the Transcendental Logic, the brilliant and baffling Transcendental Deduction (TD).
+Recall the two movements just discussed, the one from experience to its conditions and the one from Aristotelian
+functions of judgment to the concepts that we must use in all judging (the Categories). This duality led Kant to his
+famous question of right (&lt;em&gt;quid juris&lt;/em&gt;): with what right do we apply the Categories, which are not acquired from
+experience, to the contents of experience?. Kant&apos;s problem here is not as arcane as it might seem. It reflects an
+important question: How is it that the world as we experience it conforms to our logic? In briefest form, Kant thought
+that the trick to showing how it is possible for the Categories to apply to experience is to show that it is &lt;em&gt;necessary&lt;/em&gt;
+that they apply.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;TD has two sides, though Kant never treats them separately. He once called them the objective and the subjective
+deductions. The objective deduction is about the conceptual and other cognitive conditions of having representations of
+objects. It is Kant&apos;s answer to the quid juris question. Exactly how the objective deduction goes is highly
+controversial, a controversy that we will sidestep here. The subjective deduction is about what the mind, the
+“subjective sources” of understanding, must as a consequence be like. The subjective deduction is what mainly interests
+us.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kant argues as follows. Our experiences have objects, that is, they are about something. The objects of our experiences
+are discrete, unified particulars. To have such particulars available to it, the mind must construct them based on
+sensible input. To construct them, the mind must do three kinds of synthesis. It must generate temporal and spatial
+structure (Synthesis of Apprehension in Intuition). It must associate spatio-temporally structured items with other
+spatio-temporally structured items (Synthesis of Reproduction in the Imagination). And it must recognize items using
+concepts, the Categories in particular (Synthesis of Recognition in a Concept)&lt;/em&gt;. This threefold doctrine of synthesis is
+one of the cornerstones of Kant&apos;s model of the mind. We will consider it in more detail in the next Section.&lt;/p&gt;
 </content:encoded></item><item><title>Managing Tech Assets - Is a Common Library a Good Idea? No</title><link>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/managing-tech-assets-common-lib-or-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/managing-tech-assets-common-lib-or-not/</guid><description>Managing Tech Assets - Is a Common Library a Good Idea? No</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;h2&gt;A Story - A Person Created a Common Library and Then...&lt;/h2&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;&quot;Embarrassingly I introduced a &quot;common&quot; library, named as such, in a team environment a couple of decades back.
 I didn&apos;t really understand the dynamics back then of what could happen in a loosely-coordinated team setting in just a

diff --git a/sitemap-0.xml b/sitemap-0.xml
@@ -1 +1 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1"><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/about/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/Examples/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/Guides/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/Management/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/uncategorized/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Blogging/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Customization/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Demo/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Example/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Fuwari/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Management/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Markdown/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Technologies/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Video/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/guide/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/history-of-management/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/managing-tech-assets-common-lib-or-not/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/markdown-extended/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/markdown/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/reading-notes-de-administrando-imperio/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/video/</loc></url></urlset>
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1"><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/about/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/Examples/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/Guides/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/Management/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/Theory/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/uncategorized/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Blogging/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Customization/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Demo/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Example/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Fuwari/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Management/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Markdown/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Technologies/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Theory/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Video/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/guide/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/history-of-management/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/kant-view-of-mind-and-consciousness/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/managing-tech-assets-common-lib-or-not/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/markdown-extended/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/markdown/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/video/</loc></url></urlset>
Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
		@@ -1 +1 @@
		{"version":"1.1.0","languages":{"en":{"hash":"en_99cfa7c965","wasm":"en","page_count":8}}}
		{"version":"1.1.0","languages":{"en":{"hash":"en_3269bca3a4","wasm":"en","page_count":8}}}
Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
		@@ -1 +1 @@
		<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1"><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/about/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/Examples/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/Guides/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/Management/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/uncategorized/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Blogging/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Customization/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Demo/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Example/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Fuwari/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Management/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Markdown/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Technologies/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Video/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/guide/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/history-of-management/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/managing-tech-assets-common-lib-or-not/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/markdown-extended/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/markdown/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/reading-notes-de-administrando-imperio/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/video/</loc></url></urlset>
		<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1"><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/about/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/Examples/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/Guides/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/Management/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/Theory/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/category/uncategorized/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Blogging/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Customization/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Demo/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Example/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Fuwari/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Management/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Markdown/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Technologies/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Theory/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/archive/tag/Video/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/guide/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/history-of-management/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/kant-view-of-mind-and-consciousness/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/managing-tech-assets-common-lib-or-not/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/markdown-extended/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/markdown/</loc></url><url><loc>https://leadership.qubitpi.org/posts/video/</loc></url></urlset>