Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: replace FIP20 WFX code with ERC20 WPUNDIAI #920

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

zakir-code
Copy link
Contributor

@zakir-code zakir-code commented Jan 17, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Breaking Changes

    • Updated contract metadata for ERC20 and WarpToken contracts
    • Renamed contract types from WFXUpgradable to WarpTokenUpgradable
  • Refactor

    • Removed fip20upgradable.sol.go file
    • Updated contract initialization references
  • Impact

    • Existing integrations using previous contract types may require updates
    • Ensures alignment with latest contract specifications

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request involves significant changes to contract initialization and naming conventions. The primary modifications include updating metadata references for ERC20 and WarpToken contracts, replacing FIP20UpgradableMetaData and WFXUpgradableMetaData with their new counterparts. The contract/fip20upgradable.sol.go file has been completely deleted, and the test suite for ERC20 token integration has been updated to reflect these changes. These updates suggest a comprehensive refactoring of token contract implementations and their associated Go bindings.

Changes

File Change Summary
contract/contract.go Updated metadata references for erc20Init and wpundiaiInit, replacing old contract names with new ones
contract/fip20upgradable.sol.go Entire file deleted
tests/integration/erc20_token_suite.go Updated contract type from WFXUpgradable to WarpTokenUpgradable

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, contract dance!
Metadata shifts with a glance
Old names fade, new ones rise
Code transforms before our eyes
Tokens leap to fresh design 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d4c93b and f42413b.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • contract/contract.go (1 hunks)
  • contract/fip20upgradable.sol.go (0 hunks)
  • tests/integration/erc20_token_suite.go (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • contract/fip20upgradable.sol.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Mergify Merge Protections
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/integration/erc20_token_suite.go (1)

16-16: LGTM! The type changes align with the PR objectives.

The renaming from WFXUpgradable to WarpTokenUpgradable is consistent with the goal of replacing FIP20 WFX code with ERC20 WPUNDIAI. The functionality remains unchanged as all methods in the test suite continue to work with the new type.

Let's verify that all references to the old type have been updated:

Also applies to: 21-21

✅ Verification successful

Type renaming verified: WFXUpgradable → WarpTokenUpgradable

The type change has been properly propagated throughout the codebase. No references to the old type remain, and the new type is used consistently in all relevant files.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to WFXUpgradable
# Test: Search for WFXUpgradable. Expect: No matches as it should be fully replaced.
rg "WFXUpgradable"

# Test: Verify that WarpTokenUpgradable is properly used
rg "WarpTokenUpgradable"

Length of output: 58033

contract/contract.go (2)

41-44: LGTM! The WPUNDIAI contract initialization changes are consistent.

The updates to wpundiaiInit correctly reference the new WarpTokenUpgradableMetaData and its deployment source file. The contract bytecode has been updated accordingly.

Let's verify the contract bytecode:

✅ Verification successful

Contract metadata and bytecode changes verified successfully

The codebase shows consistent usage of WarpTokenUpgradableMetaData with no remnants of the old metadata. The contract bytecode is valid and properly referenced.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the contract bytecode matches the source
# Test: Search for any remaining references to the old metadata
rg "WFXUpgradableMetaData"

# Test: Check if the new metadata is properly referenced
rg "WarpTokenUpgradableMetaData"

Length of output: 1018


34-37: LGTM! The ERC20 contract initialization changes are consistent.

The updates to erc20Init correctly reference the new ERC20UpgradableMetaData and its deployment source file. The contract bytecode has been updated accordingly.

Let's verify the contract bytecode:

✅ Verification successful

Contract metadata changes are fully consistent

All references to the old FIP20UpgradableMetaData have been removed, and the new ERC20UpgradableMetaData is properly integrated across the codebase. The contract initialization is using the correct metadata for both ABI and bytecode.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the contract bytecode matches the source
# Test: Search for any remaining references to the old metadata
rg "FIP20UpgradableMetaData"

# Test: Check if the new metadata is properly referenced
rg "ERC20UpgradableMetaData"

Length of output: 916

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@zakir-code zakir-code merged commit db9d110 into main Jan 17, 2025
13 checks passed
@zakir-code zakir-code deleted the todd/contract-code branch January 17, 2025 10:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants