-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(x/crosschain): fix type registration for claim and confirm any #891
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request involves significant modifications to the crosschain module's message handling infrastructure. The changes primarily focus on removing several message types from the interface registry and codec registration, specifically targeting gravity cross-chain related messages. The modifications simplify the message type handling by reducing the number of registered message implementations and updating the interface unpacking mechanism to use a more direct approach with Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
x/crosschain/types/msgs.go (1)
323-324
: Consider enhancing error handling verbosity.While the unpacking logic is correct, consider wrapping the errors with additional context to aid in debugging:
func (m MsgClaim) UnpackInterfaces(unpacker codectypes.AnyUnpacker) error { var externalClaim ExternalClaim - return unpacker.UnpackAny(m.Claim, &externalClaim) + if err := unpacker.UnpackAny(m.Claim, &externalClaim); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to unpack ExternalClaim: %w", err) + } + return nil } func (m MsgConfirm) UnpackInterfaces(unpacker codectypes.AnyUnpacker) error { var confirm Confirm - return unpacker.UnpackAny(m.Confirm, &confirm) + if err := unpacker.UnpackAny(m.Confirm, &confirm); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to unpack Confirm: %w", err) + } + return nil }Also applies to: 701-702
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
app/interface_registry.json
(0 hunks)x/crosschain/types/codec.go
(0 hunks)x/crosschain/types/msgs.go
(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- x/crosschain/types/codec.go
- app/interface_registry.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Mergify Merge Protections
- GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (2)
x/crosschain/types/msgs.go (2)
75-78
: LGTM! Proper interface compliance registration.The compile-time interface compliance checks for
UnpackInterfacesMessage
are correctly registered for bothMsgClaim
andMsgConfirm
.
75-78
: Verify interface implementations across the codebase.Let's ensure all message types implementing these interfaces are consistently registered and handled:
Also applies to: 323-324, 701-702
✅ Verification successful
Interface implementations are properly registered and consistent
The codebase shows complete and correct registration of all message types implementing the UnpackInterfacesMessage interface, with proper interface hierarchy maintained in the codec registration system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any unregistered UnpackInterfacesMessage implementations echo "Checking for potential missing UnpackInterfacesMessage implementations..." ast-grep --pattern 'type $name struct { $$$ Claim *$_ `$$$` $$$ }' echo "Checking for potential missing Confirm implementations..." ast-grep --pattern 'type $name struct { $$$ Confirm *$_ `$$$` $$$ }'Length of output: 433
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all UnpackInterfacesMessage implementations echo "Checking UnpackInterfacesMessage implementations..." ast-grep --pattern '_ codectypes.UnpackInterfacesMessage = &$msg{}' # Find message registrations echo -e "\nChecking message registrations..." rg "RegisterImplementations|RegisterInterface" -A 3 # Find message handlers echo -e "\nChecking message handlers..." ast-grep --pattern 'func (k Keeper) $name(ctx $_ $msg types.$_) ($_)'Length of output: 10740
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Code Cleanup
Note: These changes appear to be internal architectural modifications that do not directly impact end-user functionality.