Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added percent functions. #130

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Added percent functions. #130

wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

Nic-Chr
Copy link
Contributor

@Nic-Chr Nic-Chr commented Jul 18, 2024

Added percent function and related methods as discussed.

I'm unsure about what the default digits should be set as so I just set them to 2. Maybe we could create an option the user could set for all formatting methods.

R/percent.R Show resolved Hide resolved
R/percent.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
R/percent.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
R/percent.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Nic-Chr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nic-Chr commented Aug 27, 2024

We can also replace paste() with stringr::str_c() which naturally handles NA values and zero-length vectors.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 27, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 83 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.45%. Comparing base (d737fcb) to head (322f848).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files Patch % Lines
R/percent.R 0.00% 83 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #130       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   97.40%   81.45%   -15.95%     
===========================================
  Files          13       14        +1     
  Lines         424      507       +83     
===========================================
  Hits          413      413               
- Misses         11       94       +83     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Nic-Chr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nic-Chr commented Aug 27, 2024

I also noticed a small bug where sign(x) returns a percent vector. Should fix this in the Math group generic.

R/percent.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
R/percent.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
R/percent.R Show resolved Hide resolved
@Nic-Chr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nic-Chr commented Aug 28, 2024

I also like the idea of users being able to create percent vectors using numbers representing literal percentages.
We could have for example a function called percent or create_percent that converts for example
percent(50) into 50%.
The same as doing as_percent(0.5).

@Moohan
Copy link
Member

Moohan commented Aug 28, 2024

I also like the idea of users being able to create percent vectors using numbers representing literal percentages. We could have for example a function called percent or create_percent that converts for example percent(50) into 50%. The same as doing as_percent(0.5).

I like this idea too. Also prompted the thought that we should have a check (maybe producing a warning), so if someone provides 'numbers that look like percentages' e.g. c(10, 20, 30) to as_percent() it warns them they probably did it wrong. The reverse check and warning could be used on create_percent() (format_percent(), make_percent()?)

@Nic-Chr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nic-Chr commented Aug 28, 2024

I also like the idea of users being able to create percent vectors using numbers representing literal percentages. We could have for example a function called percent or create_percent that converts for example percent(50) into 50%. The same as doing as_percent(0.5).

I like this idea too. Also prompted the thought that we should have a check (maybe producing a warning), so if someone provides 'numbers that look like percentages' e.g. c(10, 20, 30) to as_percent() it warns them they probably did it wrong. The reverse check and warning could be used on create_percent() (format_percent(), make_percent()?)

I'm a bit apprehensive about this because in general percentages above 100% are completely acceptable depending on the context. For example, in finance, percentage increases above 100% are very normal.

@Moohan
Copy link
Member

Moohan commented Aug 28, 2024

I also like the idea of users being able to create percent vectors using numbers representing literal percentages. We could have for example a function called percent or create_percent that converts for example percent(50) into 50%. The same as doing as_percent(0.5).

I like this idea too. Also prompted the thought that we should have a check (maybe producing a warning), so if someone provides 'numbers that look like percentages' e.g. c(10, 20, 30) to as_percent() it warns them they probably did it wrong. The reverse check and warning could be used on create_percent() (format_percent(), make_percent()?)

I'm a bit apprehensive about this because in general percentages above 100% are completely acceptable depending on the context. For example, in finance, percentage increases above 100% are very normal.

Light touch checks 😄

@Nic-Chr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nic-Chr commented Aug 28, 2024

I agree in principle that you can certainly have 'incorrect' percentages though I think the need to check for those is probably quite niche and maybe needs a bit of justification.

I would be inclined to go with a 'less-is-more' approach and see how users interact with this new percent object before including checks and warnings that might make things confusing.

In practice we could let the user decide that the function checks for percentages greater than a specified cut-off where the default value is say NULL or 0.

@Nic-Chr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nic-Chr commented Nov 20, 2024

I have an idea for how to deal with formatting digits greater than the default 2 decimal places without having to go through format() every single time.
We could add the digits as an attribute to the percent object itself via attr(x) <-
This way the user can specify their preferred digits when creating the object via as_percent.

For example let's say the user wants their percent vector to be formatted to 4 decimal places.
They simply use as_percent(x, digits = 4). An attribute is added to the percent vector, say .digits = 4.
All the printing/formatting functions will then use the information from this attribute to format to 4 decimal places.

Furthermore, we can code it so that if a user later decides they want a different number of decimal places, they can use format as usual to overwrite the attribute instructions for that particular call.

@Nic-Chr Nic-Chr requested a review from Moohan November 20, 2024 10:59
@Moohan
Copy link
Member

Moohan commented Dec 16, 2024

I have an idea for how to deal with formatting digits greater than the default 2 decimal places without having to go through format() every single time. We could add the digits as an attribute to the percent object itself via attr(x) <- This way the user can specify their preferred digits when creating the object via as_percent.

For example let's say the user wants their percent vector to be formatted to 4 decimal places. They simply use as_percent(x, digits = 4). An attribute is added to the percent vector, say .digits = 4. All the printing/formatting functions will then use the information from this attribute to format to 4 decimal places.

Furthermore, we can code it so that if a user later decides they want a different number of decimal places, they can use format as usual to overwrite the attribute instructions for that particular call.

Good idea.

The add here is to allow the user to set a 'default' at the moment it's 2 (per the style guide). You can print different digits with format(x, digits = n) but this will allow setting the default when the percent is created.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants