Add a \value to rename.Rd
#119
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I don't really like this as it doesn't make any sense. It's also not consistent with the tidyverse advice: https://lifecycle.r-lib.org/articles/communicate.html#rename-a-function or the example they show (rvest) - https://github.com/tidyverse/rvest/blob/HEAD/R/rename.R https://github.com/tidyverse/rvest/blob/0cda79b4671bab46ba5717c8658ff81030091281/man/rename.Rd However, I'm pretty sure it should satisfy CRAN's requirements.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #119 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.41% 97.41%
=======================================
Files 13 13
Lines 425 425
=======================================
Hits 414 414
Misses 11 11
|
Tina815
approved these changes
Nov 3, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I don't really like this as it doesn't make any sense.
It's also not consistent with the tidyverse advice: https://lifecycle.r-lib.org/articles/communicate.html#rename-a-function
or the example they show (rvest) - https://github.com/tidyverse/rvest/blob/HEAD/R/rename.R https://github.com/tidyverse/rvest/blob/0cda79b4671bab46ba5717c8658ff81030091281/man/rename.Rd
However, I'm pretty sure it should satisfy CRAN's requirements.