[CI test NOT MERGE]

[fagubla]

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Expected behavior:

Actual behavior:

Solution

How to Test

Test the steps above

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

• I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
• This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
• This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
• This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
• This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
• This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
• This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
• This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
• This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:next

[cypress]

2 failed tests on run #1078 ↗︎

2

68

13

0

0

Details:

[CI test NOT MERGE]
Project: screen-builder	Commit: 5b2d69a7d7
Status: Failed	Duration: 03:12 💡
Started: Jul 24, 2024 6:05 PM	Ended: Jul 24, 2024 6:08 PM

  FormSelectList.spec.js • 2 failed tests • CI - Chrome

View Output

Test		Artifacts
Form Select List > Options from Data Connector (single value)		Test Replay Screenshots
Form Select List > Options from Data Connector (object value)		Test Replay Screenshots

  FormInput.spec.js • 0 failed tests • CI - Chrome

View Output

Test		Artifacts

  ComplexScreen.spec.js • 0 failed tests • CI - Chrome

View Output

Test		Artifacts

  Watchers.spec.js • 0 failed tests • CI - Chrome

View Output

Test		Artifacts

  WatchersDragAndDrop.spec.js • 0 failed tests • CI - Chrome

View Output

Test		Artifacts

The first 5 failed specs are shown, see all 79 specs in Cypress Cloud.

Review all test suite changes for PR #1656 ↗︎

[processmaker-sonarqube]

Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube