Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FOUR-20583: Improve vendors, boostrap and app-layout #7798

Open
wants to merge 30 commits into
base: epic/FOUR-20336-FOUR-20337
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

henryjonathanquispe
Copy link
Contributor

@henryjonathanquispe henryjonathanquispe commented Dec 5, 2024

Solution

  • Create chunks for vendor.js in webpack.js

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

@pmPaulis pmPaulis changed the title FOUR-20583: S2: Improve vendors FOUR-20583: Improve vendors Dec 12, 2024
@pmPaulis pmPaulis changed the title FOUR-20583: Improve vendors FOUR-20583: Improve vendors, boostrap and app-layout Dec 19, 2024
@nolanpro
Copy link
Contributor

nolanpro commented Dec 19, 2024

@pmPaulis @henryjonathanquispe Here are my initial notes and questions:

  • loader*.js files have a lot of duplication. You could extract to a common folder and wrap the differences in if statements and call it like this
import { initializeCommonLoader } from "../next/commonLoader";
import sharedComponents from "../next/libraries/sharedComponents";
import vueFormElements from "../next/libraries/vueFormElements";

initializeCommonLoader({
 includeScreenBuilder: true,
 includeModeler: false,
 includeMonaco: false,
});
  • is accesibility.js being used anywhere?
  • If we make any changes to the logic in bootstrap.js and app-layout.js, do we need to duplicate that logic in the next folder until the entire app is converted to use the new code?
  • What’s the purpose of the badPractices.js file?
  • EventBus, apilient, etc. should be in their own files that are imported as a modules instead of being passed in with globalInput in next/config/*.js files. Can we get rid of globalInput attribute everywhere? If you really need a global import and use the globalVariables.js helper.

Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants