Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Temporal bipartite projection #1396

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
May 28, 2024
Merged

Temporal bipartite projection #1396

merged 12 commits into from
May 28, 2024

Conversation

narnolddd
Copy link
Collaborator

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Takes a temporal bipartite network with typed vertices and projects it along one side according to a time delta.

Why are the changes needed?

Feature for bipartite nets.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? If yes is this documented?

Yes, not yet but will add some docs for it

How was this patch tested?

Unit tests to check right graph is created

Issues

If this resolves any issues, please link to them here, the format is a KEYWORD followed by @_
KEYWORDS available are close, closes, closed, fix, fixes, fixed, resolve, resolves, resolved.
Please delete this text before creating your PR

Are there any further changes required?

Lots of tidying and adding params to select expected edge direction etc.

@narnolddd narnolddd marked this pull request as ready for review April 11, 2024 16:58
@narnolddd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Could also/alternatively do the projected graph as a graph with deletions (first draft of this was pre graph with deletions)

@narnolddd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tidied now and changed in-edge to edge thanks to the nbr function

@miratepuffin miratepuffin merged commit c756af4 into master May 28, 2024
13 checks passed
@miratepuffin miratepuffin deleted the temporal_bipartite branch May 28, 2024 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants