refactor: separate all the context into a individual file #1676
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces significant changes to the TypeScript configuration and the React context providers within the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (33)
packages/extension-ui/tsconfig.build.json (1)
21-22: Question: Is this dependency direction change intentional?The PR objective mentions separating context into individual files, but this change appears to create a new dependency from extension-ui to extension-polkagate. This seems to contradict the goal of separation. Could you explain:
- Why extension-ui needs to depend on extension-polkagate?
- How this aligns with the context separation objective?
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/ActionProvider.tsx (2)
9-13: Consider enhancing the navigation implementationThe direct manipulation of
window.location.hashcould make testing difficult and might not handle all edge cases. Consider:
- Adding input validation for the
toparameter- Using a more robust routing solution or abstracting the navigation logic
- Adding error handling for invalid hash values
Here's a suggested improvement:
- const onAction = useCallback((to?: string): void => { - if (to) { - window.location.hash = to; - } - }, []); + const onAction = useCallback((to?: string): void => { + if (!to) return; + + try { + // Validate the hash value + const sanitizedHash = to.startsWith('#') ? to : `#${to}`; + window.location.hash = sanitizedHash; + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to update navigation:', error); + } + }, []);
8-20: Add unit tests for the ActionProviderThe component lacks test coverage. Consider adding tests to verify:
- Proper context value propagation
- Navigation behavior with valid and invalid inputs
- Error handling scenarios
Would you like me to help create a test suite for this component?
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/AlertProvider.tsx (2)
4-4: Review cross-package dependenciesThe component is importing types and context from
@polkadot/extension-polkagatewhile being located inextension-ui. This cross-package dependency might lead to circular dependency issues and could make the codebase harder to maintain.Consider:
- Moving shared types and contexts to a common package
- Or moving this provider to the
extension-polkagatepackage if it's specifically tied to that package's functionalityAlso applies to: 8-8
10-18: LGTM with enhancement suggestionsThe AlertProvider implementation is clean and follows React best practices. However, it could benefit from some enhancements.
Consider adding:
- A maximum limit for alerts to prevent memory issues
- Auto-cleanup for stale alerts
- Helper methods for common alert operations
Here's a suggested enhancement:
export default function AlertProvider ({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { const [alerts, setAlerts] = useState<AlertType[]>([]); + + const addAlert = useCallback((alert: AlertType) => { + setAlerts((current) => { + const newAlerts = [...current, alert].slice(-5); // Keep last 5 alerts + return newAlerts; + }); + + // Auto-cleanup after 5 seconds + setTimeout(() => { + setAlerts((current) => + current.filter((a) => a !== alert) + ); + }, 5000); + }, []); return ( - <AlertContext.Provider value={{ alerts, setAlerts }}> + <AlertContext.Provider value={{ alerts, setAlerts, addAlert }}> {children} </AlertContext.Provider> ); }packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/ReferendaProvider.tsx (1)
10-18: LGTM! Clean and well-structured context providerThe implementation follows React best practices:
- Properly typed props and state
- Clean context value structure with both state and setter
- Correct usage of children prop for composition
Consider adding a type for the context value to make it more maintainable:
type ReferendaContextValue = { refs: LatestRefs; setRefs: React.Dispatch<React.SetStateAction<LatestRefs>>; };packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/ApiProvider.tsx (1)
10-22: Add type safety and validationThe component could benefit from additional type safety and validation:
- No validation of the initial state
- No type guards for API state updates
Consider adding validation:
export default function ApiProvider ({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { const [apis, setApis] = useState<APIs>({}); - const setIt = (change: APIs) => { + const updateApis = React.useCallback((change: APIs) => { + // Validate the new APIs state + if (!change || typeof change !== 'object') { + console.warn('Invalid APIs state update:', change); + return; + } setApis(change); - }; + }, []); return ( - <APIContext.Provider value={{ apis, setIt }}> + <APIContext.Provider value={{ apis, updateApis }}> {children} </APIContext.Provider> ); }packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/GenesisHashOptionsProvider.tsx (2)
6-7: Review package dependencies: UI package should not depend on polkagateThe UI package importing from
@polkadot/extension-polkagatecreates a tight coupling between these packages. Consider:
- Moving shared contexts and hooks to a common package
- Inverting the dependency by moving this provider to the polkagate package
- Using dependency injection pattern to decouple the packages
This will improve maintainability and prevent circular dependencies.
9-17: LGTM! Consider adding TypeScript types for context valueThe component implementation follows React best practices and properly implements the provider pattern. However, it could benefit from explicit typing of the context value.
Consider adding type definitions:
interface GenesisHashOptionsContextValue { // Add your context value type definitions here // Example: // options: Array<{ hash: string, name: string }>; // selectedHash: string | null; // setSelectedHash: (hash: string) => void; } export default function GenesisHashOptionsProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { const genesisHashOptionsCtx: GenesisHashOptionsContextValue = useGenesisHashOptions(); return ( <GenesisHashOptionsContext.Provider value={genesisHashOptionsCtx}> {children} </GenesisHashOptionsContext.Provider> ); }packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/FetchingProvider.tsx (2)
11-11: Consider making the default state explicitThe empty object default state could be made more explicit for better code readability.
-const [fetching, setFetching] = useState<Fetching>({}); +const DEFAULT_FETCHING_STATE: Fetching = {}; +const [fetching, setFetching] = useState<Fetching>(DEFAULT_FETCHING_STATE);
17-21: Consider defining an explicit type for the context valueThe shape of the context value could be explicitly typed for better maintainability and type safety.
+interface FetchingContextValue { + fetching: Fetching; + set: (change: Fetching) => void; +} return ( - <FetchingContext.Provider value={{ fetching, set }}> + <FetchingContext.Provider value={{ fetching, set } satisfies FetchingContextValue}> {children} </FetchingContext.Provider> );packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/WorkerProvider.tsx (2)
6-6: Consider moving shared contexts to a common packageThe WorkerContext is imported from
@polkadot/extension-polkagate, which creates tight coupling between packages. Consider moving shared contexts to a common package to improve modularity and maintainability.
28-32: LGTM with a minor suggestion for type safetyThe implementation is clean and follows React best practices. Consider creating a type for the context value to ensure consistent typing across consumers.
type WorkerContextValue = Worker | undefined; // In your context file: export const WorkerContext = React.createContext<WorkerContextValue>(undefined);packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/SettingsProvider.tsx (3)
8-8: Consider restructuring the import pathThe import from
@polkadot/extension-polkagate/src/components/contextsdirectly references thesrcdirectory of another package. This creates tight coupling and could make the code more fragile during refactoring.Consider exposing the context through the package's main entry point instead:
-import { SettingsContext } from '@polkadot/extension-polkagate/src/components/contexts'; +import { SettingsContext } from '@polkadot/extension-polkagate';
15-16: Consider adding error handling for settings initializationThe initial settings are fetched synchronously without error handling. If
uiSettings.get()fails, it could cause runtime errors.-const [settingsCtx, setSettingsCtx] = useState<SettingsStruct>(uiSettings.get()); +const [settingsCtx, setSettingsCtx] = useState<SettingsStruct>(() => { + try { + return uiSettings.get(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to load settings:', error); + return {} as SettingsStruct; // or some default settings + } +});
26-30: Consider performance optimizationFor better performance with large component trees, consider using React.memo for the provider component.
-export default function SettingsProvider ({ children }: SettingsProviderProps) { +export default React.memo(function SettingsProvider ({ children }: SettingsProviderProps) { // ... existing implementation ... -} +});packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/UserAddedChainsProvider.tsx (2)
11-13: Enhance type safety of the initial stateWhile the implementation is functional, we can improve type safety by explicitly typing the empty object:
- const [userAddedChainCtx, setUserAddedChainCtx] = useState<UserAddedChains>({}); + const [userAddedChainCtx, setUserAddedChainCtx] = useState<UserAddedChains>({} as UserAddedChains);
21-26: Consider memoizing the context valueTo prevent unnecessary rerenders of child components, consider memoizing the context value:
+ import { useMemo } from 'react'; export default function UserAddedChainsProvider ({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { const [userAddedChainCtx, setUserAddedChainCtx] = useState<UserAddedChains>({}); + const value = useMemo(() => userAddedChainCtx, [userAddedChainCtx]); // ... effect hook ... return ( - <UserAddedChainContext.Provider value={userAddedChainCtx}> + <UserAddedChainContext.Provider value={value}> {children} </UserAddedChainContext.Provider> ); }packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/AccountIconThemeProvider.tsx (1)
8-10: Consider restructuring package dependenciesThe component is located in
extension-uibut imports fromextension-polkagate. This creates a circular dependency between packages. Consider:
- Moving shared utilities and contexts to a common package
- Or moving this provider to
extension-polkagateif it's specific to that packagepackages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/AccountAssetProvider.tsx (2)
4-4: Consider using type-only imports for context typesFor better type safety and clearer code organization, consider using type-only imports for the context types.
-import { AccountContext, AccountsAssetsContext, AlertContext, GenesisHashOptionsContext, UserAddedChainContext, WorkerContext } from '@polkadot/extension-polkagate/src/components/contexts'; +import type { AccountContext, AccountsAssetsContext, AlertContext, GenesisHashOptionsContext, UserAddedChainContext, WorkerContext } from '@polkadot/extension-polkagate/src/components/contexts'; +import { AccountContext, AccountsAssetsContext, AlertContext, GenesisHashOptionsContext, UserAddedChainContext, WorkerContext } from '@polkadot/extension-polkagate/src/components/contexts';Also applies to: 8-8
31-44: Consider optimizing the cleanup effectThe current implementation could be optimized by:
- Using Set for faster lookups
- Batching storage updates
useEffect(() => { /** remove forgotten accounts from assetChains if any */ if (accounts && assetsOnChains?.balances) { + const accountAddresses = new Set(accounts.map(({ address }) => address)); + let hasChanges = false; Object.keys(assetsOnChains.balances).forEach((_address) => { - const found = accounts.find(({ address }) => address === _address); - if (!found) { + if (!accountAddresses.has(_address)) { delete assetsOnChains.balances[_address]; - setStorage(ASSETS_NAME_IN_STORAGE, assetsOnChains, true).catch(console.error); + hasChanges = true; } }); + if (hasChanges) { + setStorage(ASSETS_NAME_IN_STORAGE, assetsOnChains, true).catch(console.error); + } } }, [accounts?.length, assetsOnChains?.timeStamp]);packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/CurrencyProvider.tsx (2)
22-23: Consider exposing loading state to consumers.The component tracks fetching state internally but doesn't expose it through the context. This could be useful for consumers to show loading indicators.
- const [currency, setCurrency] = useState<CurrencyItemType>(); + const [currency, setCurrency] = useState<CurrencyItemType>(); + const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false); return ( - <CurrencyContext.Provider value={{ currency, setCurrency }}> + <CurrencyContext.Provider value={{ currency, setCurrency, isLoading }}>
1-61: Good separation of concerns, consider documentation.The separation of currency context into its own provider aligns well with the PR's objective of better organization. Consider adding:
- JSDoc comments to document the context's purpose and usage
- A README.md in the contexts directory explaining the provider hierarchy and initialization order
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 42-42: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/AccountProvider.tsx (2)
9-12: Consider restructuring imports to avoid implementation detailsThe imports from
@polkadot/extension-polkagate/srcare reaching into implementation details. Consider moving these utilities and types to a public API surface (e.g., index files) instead of importing directly fromsrcdirectories.
66-74: Consider explicit loading state handlingInstead of returning null when accounts aren't loaded, consider:
- Providing a loading state to consumers
- Using a loading spinner or placeholder
- Adding error boundaries for failed account loading
This would give consumers more control over the UI during loading.
+ if (accounts === null) { + return <LoadingSpinner message="Loading accounts..." />; + } - if (!accounts) { - return null; - }packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/routes/RouteDefinitions.tsx (2)
Line range hint
433-454: LGTM! Component structure changes look good.The conversion to a named function export and removal of
React.memois acceptable since:
- The component doesn't receive props
- Route generation is already memoized internally
- The component is likely to remain stable once mounted
If this component needs to accept props in the future, consider re-introducing
React.memoto prevent unnecessary re-renders.
Line range hint
8-67: Consider implementing code-splitting for better performance.The current implementation eagerly imports all route components. Consider using
React.lazyandSuspensefor route-based code splitting to improve initial load time and bundle size.Example implementation:
- import AccountFS from '@polkadot/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/accountDetails'; + const AccountFS = React.lazy(() => import('@polkadot/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/accountDetails')); // Wrap Switch with Suspense export default function Routes() { // ... return ( + <Suspense fallback={<Loading />}> <Switch> {routeComponents} </Switch> + </Suspense> ); }packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/index.tsx (1)
11-11: Refactor import statement for better readabilityThe import statement on line 11 is quite long and may affect readability. Consider splitting the imports into multiple lines or grouping them for clarity.
Apply this diff to improve readability:
-import { AccountAssetProvider, AccountIconThemeProvider, AccountProvider, ActionProvider, AlertProvider, ApiProvider, CurrencyProvider, FetchingProvider, GenesisHashOptionsProvider, MediaProvider, ReferendaProvider, RequestsProvider, SettingsProvider, UserAddedChainsProvider, WorkerProvider } from './contexts'; +import { + AccountAssetProvider, + AccountIconThemeProvider, + AccountProvider, + ActionProvider, + AlertProvider, + ApiProvider, + CurrencyProvider, + FetchingProvider, + GenesisHashOptionsProvider, + MediaProvider, + ReferendaProvider, + RequestsProvider, + SettingsProvider, + UserAddedChainsProvider, + WorkerProvider +} from './contexts';packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/RequestsProvider.tsx (5)
24-55: Evaluate the necessity of usinguseLayoutEffectThe
useLayoutEffecthook is intended for synchronously running effects that read or write layout before the browser paints. Since this effect doesn't perform any DOM mutations or measurements, consider usinguseEffectinstead to avoid blocking visual updates.
26-31: Reassess the use of theisMountedflagThe
isMountedflag within the effect might be unnecessary. React ensures that effects are cleaned up properly upon unmounting. Removing the flag could simplify the code without impacting functionality.
55-55: Dependency array optimizationIncluding both the state variables and their properties in the dependency array might be redundant. Since changes in
authRequests,metaRequests, orsignRequestswould trigger the effect, you may not need to includeauthRequests?.length,metaRequests?.length, andsignRequests?.length.
65-67: Provide a fallback UI during data loadingWhen the requests are
null, the component returnsnull, resulting in no render. Consider displaying a loading indicator or placeholder to enhance user experience while the data is being fetched.
70-76: Simplify nested context providersThe multiple nested context providers can affect readability. To improve maintainability, consider composing the contexts into a single provider or using a helper function to reduce the nesting depth.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
packages/extension-polkagate/tsconfig.build.json(0 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/AccountAssetProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/AccountIconThemeProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/AccountProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/ActionProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/AlertProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/ApiProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/CurrencyProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/FetchingProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/GenesisHashOptionsProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/MediaProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/ReferendaProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/RequestsProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/SettingsProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/UserAddedChainsProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/WorkerProvider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/routes/RouteDefinitions.tsx(2 hunks)packages/extension-ui/tsconfig.build.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/extension-polkagate/tsconfig.build.json
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/CurrencyProvider.tsx
[error] 42-42: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
🔇 Additional comments (27)
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/ActionProvider.tsx (1)
6-6: Consider relocating the ActionContext to avoid cross-package dependencies
The ActionContext is imported from @polkadot/extension-polkagate while this provider is in extension-ui. This creates a potentially problematic dependency where a base UI package depends on an extension package. Consider moving the context definition to extension-ui or a shared package to maintain a cleaner architecture.
Let's verify the dependency structure:
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/ReferendaProvider.tsx (2)
11-11: Consider initializing with proper default state
The empty object initialization for refs might not cover all required fields of LatestRefs.
Let's check the type definition to ensure proper initialization:
4-4: Consider restructuring cross-package imports
The imports are crossing package boundaries from extension-ui to extension-polkagate, which could lead to circular dependencies. Consider:
- Moving shared types and contexts to a common package
- Or restructuring the imports to maintain better package isolation
Let's verify the package structure and potential circular dependencies:
Also applies to: 8-8
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/ApiProvider.tsx (2)
17-21: Verify context usage patterns
The context implementation looks correct, but we should verify:
- How consumers are using this context
- If the context has proper TypeScript types
✅ Verification successful
Context implementation is properly typed and used correctly
The verification shows that:
- The context is properly typed with
APIsContextinterface containingapis: APIsandsetItfunction - It's consumed correctly in hooks (
useApianduseApiWithChain) - The implementation follows React's context patterns with proper typing and state management
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for APIContext usage patterns
rg -t tsx -t ts "useContext.*APIContext" -A 3
# Check for proper type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'type $name = {
apis: $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 132
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for APIContext usage with correct file extensions
rg "useContext.*APIContext" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.ts" -A 3
# Check for type definitions related to APIContext
rg "type.*APIContext" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.ts" -A 3
# Look for APIContext definition and initialization
rg "createContext.*APIContext" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.ts" -A 3
# Search for any direct APIContext references
rg "APIContext" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.ts" -A 3
Length of output: 4195
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for APIsContext type definition
rg "APIsContext" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.ts" -A 3
# Look for APIs type definition
rg "type.*APIs" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.ts" -A 3
# Check for setIt function definition
rg "setIt.*=" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.ts" -A 3
Length of output: 4890
4-8: Consider restructuring the imports for better modularity
The current imports create tight coupling with the @polkadot/extension-polkagate package. Consider:
- Moving shared types and contexts to a common package
- Relocating
APIContextfrom components directory to a dedicated contexts directory
Let's verify the current structure:
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/FetchingProvider.tsx (2)
4-4: Consider reducing cross-package dependencies
The component imports types and contexts directly from extension-polkagate, which creates a tight coupling between extension-ui and extension-polkagate. Consider:
- Moving shared types and contexts to a common package
- Or creating UI-specific interfaces in
extension-uithat can be implemented by different extensions
Let's verify the extent of cross-package dependencies:
Also applies to: 8-8
10-22: Verify the integration and usage of FetchingProvider
The component looks well-implemented, but let's ensure it's properly integrated and utilized.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response about the FetchingProvider's integration and usage:
FetchingProvider is properly integrated and actively used
The component is:
- Correctly integrated in the provider hierarchy in
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/index.tsx - Used by multiple hooks in the polkagate extension through
useContext(FetchingContext):- useNativeAssetBalances
- usePoolBalances
- usePool
The context is properly consumed and the implementation follows React best practices.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check where FetchingProvider is used
echo "Checking FetchingProvider usage:"
rg -A 2 "FetchingProvider" --type typescript
# Check for FetchingContext consumers
echo "Checking FetchingContext consumers:"
ast-grep --pattern 'useContext($ctx)' | rg "FetchingContext"
Length of output: 296
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check where FetchingProvider is used with proper file extensions
echo "Checking FetchingProvider usage:"
rg -A 2 "FetchingProvider" --type ts --type tsx
# Check for FetchingContext consumers
echo "Checking FetchingContext consumers:"
rg "FetchingContext" --type ts --type tsx
# Check for any imports of FetchingProvider
echo "Checking FetchingProvider imports:"
rg "import.*FetchingProvider" --type ts --type tsx
# Check for any direct usage of useContext with FetchingContext
echo "Checking direct context usage:"
rg "useContext\(FetchingContext\)" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 618
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for FetchingProvider usage without file type restrictions
echo "Checking FetchingProvider usage:"
rg -A 2 "FetchingProvider"
# Search for FetchingContext usage
echo "Checking FetchingContext usage:"
rg "FetchingContext"
# Look for files that might contain the provider
echo "Finding relevant files:"
fd -e tsx -e ts
Length of output: 62761
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/WorkerProvider.tsx (1)
16-16: Verify shared worker implementation and usage
Let's verify the existence and implementation of the shared worker file.
✅ Verification successful
Shared worker implementation is valid and consistent
The shared worker file exists and is properly implemented with message handling for asset-related operations. The worker usage pattern across the codebase is consistent, with multiple worker implementations following similar patterns:
- Worker file exists at the correct location
- Implementation includes proper message handling
- Error handling is in place
- Worker cleanup is handled on unmount
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the worker file exists and examine its implementation
fd sharedWorker.js
# Look for other worker usages to ensure consistent implementation
rg -A 5 "new Worker\(" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 156
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of the worker file
cat packages/extension-polkagate/src/util/workers/sharedWorker.js
# Search for worker usage with correct file type
rg -A 5 "new Worker\(" --type typescript --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}'
Length of output: 8563
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/SettingsProvider.tsx (2)
11-13: LGTM!
The props interface is well-defined and follows React TypeScript best practices.
1-31: Implementation aligns with PR objectives
The separation of the settings context into its own file aligns well with the PR's goal of improving code organization. The implementation follows a clean pattern that can be consistently applied to other context providers.
Let's verify the consistency of this pattern across other context providers:
✅ Verification successful
Implementation aligns with PR objectives and follows consistent patterns
The verification confirms that the SettingsProvider implementation follows the same consistent pattern used across all context providers in the codebase. All providers share common characteristics:
- React context provider pattern with children prop
- useState/useEffect hooks for state management
- Consistent file structure and naming
- Clean separation of concerns
The implementation successfully contributes to the PR's goal of separating contexts into individual files while maintaining consistency with the established patterns in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other context providers follow the same pattern
# Expected: Similar structure in other provider files
# Search for other context provider files
fd -e tsx -e ts "Provider\.tsx?$" packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/ --exec \
ast-grep --pattern $'import React, { useEffect, useState } from "react";
$$$
export default function $PROVIDER({ children }: $PROPS) {
const [$STATE] = useState$$$
$$$
return (
<$CONTEXT.Provider value={$$$}>
{children}
</$CONTEXT.Provider>
);
}'
Length of output: 352
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find context providers and analyze their structure
# First, find all provider files
fd -e tsx -e ts "Provider\.tsx?$" packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/
# Then, let's look at their content
fd -e tsx -e ts "Provider\.tsx?$" packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 19970
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/UserAddedChainsProvider.tsx (1)
4-4: Review the import dependencies to prevent circular references
The component is importing from @polkadot/extension-polkagate while being located in extension-ui. This structure might indicate circular dependencies between packages. Consider:
- Moving shared types and contexts to a common package
- Restructuring the imports to maintain a clear dependency hierarchy
Let's verify the package dependencies:
Also applies to: 8-9
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/AccountIconThemeProvider.tsx (3)
12-13: LGTM! Well-typed component definition
The component is properly typed with React.ReactNode for children and maintains type safety with IconTheme.
27-31: LGTM! Verify context usage across components
The context provider implementation is correct. Let's verify its usage across components:
✅ Verification successful
Context usage is properly implemented across components
The verification shows:
- Context is correctly consumed using
useContextin two components:SelectIdenticonTheme.tsx- uses both theme and setterIdenticon.tsx- uses only theme value
- Theme updates are properly managed through the context's setter:
- Storage updates in
SelectIdenticonTheme.tsxare followed by context updates - No direct theme manipulations bypassing the context
- Storage updates in
- Type safety is maintained through
AccountIconThemeContextType
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for proper context consumption
ast-grep --pattern 'useContext(AccountIconThemeContext)'
# Verify there are no direct theme manipulations bypassing the context
rg -A 5 'setAccountIconTheme' --type ts
Length of output: 4411
15-25: Enhance error handling for storage operations
While console.error catches failures, consider implementing proper error handling to maintain UI state consistency in case of storage failures.
useEffect(() => {
getStorage('iconTheme')
- .then((maybeTheme) => setAccountIconTheme((maybeTheme as IconTheme | undefined) || DEFAULT_ACCOUNT_ICON_THEME))
- .catch(console.error);
+ .then((maybeTheme) => {
+ if (maybeTheme && !['polkadot', 'substrate', 'beachball', 'jdenticon'].includes(maybeTheme as string)) {
+ console.warn(`Invalid theme value: ${maybeTheme}, falling back to default`);
+ return setAccountIconTheme(DEFAULT_ACCOUNT_ICON_THEME);
+ }
+ setAccountIconTheme((maybeTheme as IconTheme | undefined) || DEFAULT_ACCOUNT_ICON_THEME);
+ })
+ .catch((error) => {
+ console.error('Failed to load icon theme:', error);
+ setAccountIconTheme(DEFAULT_ACCOUNT_ICON_THEME);
+ });Also, let's verify the storage implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional verification scripts to check the storage implementation and theme validation:
This will help us verify the storage operations and theme validation before making a final decision on the review comment.
Let me check one more aspect to verify the IconTheme type and its allowed values:
This will help us understand the type constraints and existing validation patterns before making the final decision.
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
Storage operations are safe, but theme validation can be improved
The current implementation falls back to DEFAULT_ACCOUNT_ICON_THEME ('beachball') when storage fails, which is good. However, the suggested validation would indeed improve type safety and user feedback. The codebase shows consistent usage of specific themes ('polkadot', 'substrate', 'beachball', 'jdenticon') across multiple components.
useEffect(() => {
getStorage('iconTheme')
- .then((maybeTheme) => setAccountIconTheme((maybeTheme as IconTheme | undefined) || DEFAULT_ACCOUNT_ICON_THEME))
- .catch(console.error);
+ .then((maybeTheme) => {
+ if (maybeTheme && !['polkadot', 'substrate', 'beachball', 'jdenticon'].includes(maybeTheme as string)) {
+ console.warn(`Invalid theme value: ${maybeTheme}, falling back to default`);
+ return setAccountIconTheme(DEFAULT_ACCOUNT_ICON_THEME);
+ }
+ setAccountIconTheme((maybeTheme as IconTheme | undefined) || DEFAULT_ACCOUNT_ICON_THEME);
+ })
+ .catch((error) => {
+ console.error('Failed to load icon theme:', error);
+ setAccountIconTheme(DEFAULT_ACCOUNT_ICON_THEME);
+ });🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check storage implementation for proper typing and consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'function getStorage($_) {
$$$
}'
# Check for other theme-related storage operations
rg -A 5 'iconTheme' --type ts
Length of output: 21407
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check storage implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function setStorage($_) {
$$$
}'
# Check watchStorage implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function watchStorage($_) {
$$$
}'
# Check IconTheme type definition
rg -A 5 'type IconTheme' --type ts
# Check DEFAULT_ACCOUNT_ICON_THEME definition
rg 'DEFAULT_ACCOUNT_ICON_THEME' --type ts
Length of output: 823
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find IconTheme type definition and usage
rg -p "export (type|interface) IconTheme" --type ts -A 5
# Check if there's any theme validation logic
rg -p "iconTheme.*=.*('polkadot'|'substrate'|'beachball'|'jdenticon')" --type ts
Length of output: 1949
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/MediaProvider.tsx (2)
8-10: LGTM! Interface is well-defined
The MediaProviderProps interface correctly types the children prop using React.ReactNode.
18-22: Verify security requirements for camera access
Please ensure this implementation aligns with the project's security requirements for camera access. Consider:
- Whether explicit user consent UI is required before requesting permissions
- If there are specific security policies or guidelines for media access
✅ Verification successful
Camera access implementation follows security best practices
The implementation is secure and well-structured for the following reasons:
- Camera access is controlled by a settings context (
settings.camera === 'on') - Proper user consent UI exists with clear messages in translations
- Camera permission is requested only when explicitly enabled by user settings
- The manifest.json correctly declares only necessary permissions
- Error handling is in place for denied permissions
- Clear user guidance is provided through translation strings
Additional observations:
- Camera access is properly gated behind user settings
- UI messages guide users on enabling camera access
- Implementation follows the principle of least privilege
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for existing media access patterns and security policies
echo "Searching for existing media access patterns..."
rg -l "getUserMedia|mediaDevices"
echo "Searching for security documentation..."
fd -e md -e txt -e doc | xargs rg -l "security|camera|media|permission"
Length of output: 460
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any UI components or hooks related to camera permissions
echo "Searching for permission-related UI components..."
rg -A 5 -B 5 "permission|consent|allow|camera" --type tsx --type ts
# Check if there are any existing security or permission checks
echo "Searching for security checks..."
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($$$) { navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia($$$) }'
# Look for any related test files
echo "Searching for related test files..."
fd -e test.tsx -e test.ts -e spec.tsx -e spec.ts | xargs rg -l "media|camera|permission"
# Check for any configuration files that might contain security settings
echo "Searching for configuration files..."
fd -e config.ts -e config.js -e json | xargs rg -l "security|permission|media"
Length of output: 1051
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the MediaProvider component's full implementation
echo "Checking MediaProvider implementation..."
cat packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/MediaProvider.tsx
# Check manifest.json for any relevant permissions
echo "Checking manifest permissions..."
cat packages/extension/manifest.json
# Check translation files for any camera-related UI messages
echo "Checking translation files for camera-related messages..."
cat packages/extension/public/locales/en/translation.json | grep -i "camera\|permission\|media"
Length of output: 3739
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/AccountAssetProvider.tsx (3)
46-51: LGTM! Context provider implementation is correct
The component correctly provides the assets context and renders children.
24-24: Verify useNFT hook usage
The useNFT hook is called but its return value isn't used. Ensure this is intentional and the hook is properly handling side effects internally.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the implementation shown, I can generate the final response now:
useNFT hook is correctly implemented for side effects
The hook is properly implemented to handle side effects internally - it fetches NFT data using a web worker and stores the results in Chrome storage. It's intentionally designed not to return any values as it's a side-effect hook that updates a shared storage state. The current usage is correct.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check useNFT hook implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function useNFT($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 5313
13-20: Verify context providers in the component tree
The component uses multiple contexts. Ensure all required context providers are present higher up in the component tree.
✅ Verification successful
All required context providers are properly configured
Based on the verification results, all the context providers used in AccountAssetProvider (AccountContext, GenesisHashOptionsContext, AlertContext, UserAddedChainContext, and WorkerContext) are properly provided higher up in the component tree as shown in packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/index.tsx. The providers are composed in the correct order, ensuring that all required contexts are available to the AccountAssetProvider component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for context provider usage in parent components
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $_ } from "@polkadot/extension-polkagate/src/components/contexts"'
# Search for provider components in the tree
rg -l "Provider.*value=\{.*\}" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 179
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for context provider components and their usage
rg -t typescript -t typescriptreact "Provider.*value=\{.*\}"
# Search for context definitions
rg -t typescript -t typescriptreact "createContext|Context\s*=\s*React\.createContext"
# Search for imports of the specific contexts used in the component
rg -t typescript -t typescriptreact "import.*\{.*(AccountContext|GenesisHashOptionsContext|AlertContext|UserAddedChainContext|WorkerContext).*\}"
Length of output: 404
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for context provider components and their usage
rg "Provider.*value=\{.*\}" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx
# Search for context definitions
rg "createContext|Context\s*=\s*React\.createContext" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx
# Find files importing these contexts
rg "import.*\{.*(AccountContext|GenesisHashOptionsContext|AlertContext|UserAddedChainContext|WorkerContext).*\}" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx
# List all TypeScript/React files to verify file type detection
fd -e ts -e tsx -e jsx
Length of output: 59943
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for context definitions in the specific contexts file
rg -A 5 "createContext|Context\s*=\s*React\.createContext" packages/extension-polkagate/src/components/contexts.tsx
# Search for provider components in the UI contexts directory
rg -A 5 "Provider.*value=\{.*\}" packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/
# Search for where these specific contexts are provided higher up in the component tree
rg "AccountContext|GenesisHashOptionsContext|AlertContext|UserAddedChainContext|WorkerContext" packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/index.tsx
Length of output: 8929
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the Popup/index.tsx file content to see how providers are composed
cat packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/index.tsx
# Check if there are any other files that might show the provider composition
rg -l "AccountProvider|GenesisHashOptionsProvider|AlertProvider|UserAddedChainsProvider|WorkerProvider" packages/extension-ui/src/
Length of output: 2937
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/CurrencyProvider.tsx (3)
1-17: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.
The imports are properly organized, and the props interface is correctly typed.
56-61: LGTM! Clean and standard context provider implementation.
The rendering implementation follows React best practices.
25-54: Consider extracting price fetching logic to a custom hook.
The price fetching logic in useEffect is complex and could be reused elsewhere. Consider extracting it to a custom hook like usePriceFetching.
Also, there are a few concerns in the current implementation:
- Error handling only logs to console, consider proper error handling/reporting
- The TODO comment on line 36 indicates a potential issue with chain selection
Let's verify if chain selection affects prices elsewhere:
✅ Verification successful
Consider extracting price fetching logic to a custom hook and improving error handling
The search results show that chain selection doesn't directly affect price fetching in the current implementation. The prices are fetched based on priceIds which are determined separately for each chain/token. However, the original review suggestions about code organization and error handling remain valid:
- The price fetching logic should be extracted to a custom hook for better reusability, as similar price-related logic exists in other components (e.g.,
useTokenPrice.ts). - The current error handling only logs to console, which should be improved for better user experience.
The TODO comment about chain selection can be safely removed as the implementation correctly handles prices per chain through the priceIds mapping.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for chain selection logic that might affect prices
rg -l "chain.*selection.*price" || rg -l "price.*chain.*change"
Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for chain-related state or selection that might affect prices
rg -A 5 "selectedChain|chainState|currentChain" packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/
# Also search for price-related functions and components
ast-grep --pattern 'function $NAME($$$) {
$$$
price$$$
$$$
}'
# And check where prices are being used with chain information
rg -A 5 "getPrices.*chain|price.*chain"
Length of output: 10122
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 42-42: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/AccountProvider.tsx (1)
14-23: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add type safety for master account
The master property might be undefined when no suitable master account is found. Consider either:
- Making it explicit in the type system by declaring it as
master?: AccountJson - Providing a fallback or handling the case where no master account exists
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/routes/RouteDefinitions.tsx (2)
Line range hint 433-454: Verify context availability in route components.
As part of the context separation refactoring, we should ensure route components have access to their required contexts.
Let's check the context usage:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the route components and their context usage.
Let me try one more search to locate the route components and their context usage.
Based on the initial context search results, I can see that:
- All necessary contexts are properly defined in the
contextsdirectory - The contexts are properly wrapped in providers
- There's a clear hierarchy of context providers without circular dependencies
- The contexts are properly imported and used across components
Context integration appears to be properly implemented.
- The context providers are well-organized in separate files under
contexts/ - Each context has its own provider component that properly wraps children
- The RequestsProvider shows proper composition of multiple contexts
- No circular dependencies were detected in the context usage
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze context usage in route components
# Check for context imports and usage
echo "Checking context usage in components..."
rg -A 5 "useContext|Context\." packages/extension-ui/src/
# Check for potential circular dependencies
echo "Checking for potential circular dependencies..."
rg -l "import.*from.*Popup" packages/extension-ui/src/ | \
xargs -I {} rg -l "import.*from.*context" {}
Length of output: 12082
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check ALL_ROUTES definition and components
echo "Checking ALL_ROUTES definition..."
rg -A 10 "ALL_ROUTES\s*=" packages/extension-ui/src/
# Check context usage in route components
echo "Checking context imports in route components..."
fd -e tsx -e ts -p ".*Route.*" packages/extension-ui/src/ --exec rg -l "useContext|Context\."
Length of output: 332
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find route components and their imports
echo "Checking route components and their imports..."
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $_ } from $_' packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/routes/RouteDefinitions.tsx
# Check ALL_ROUTES definition with more context
echo "Checking ALL_ROUTES definition with imports..."
rg -B 10 -A 5 "ALL_ROUTES\s*=" packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/routes/RouteDefinitions.tsx
Length of output: 403
Line range hint 1-432: Verify security measures for sensitive routes.
Several routes handle sensitive operations:
- Password management (
/login-password,/forgot-password,/reset-wallet) - Account export (
/export/:address,/account/export-all) - Private key operations (import/derive routes)
Let's verify the security measures:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response. The code shows that sensitive operations are protected through various mechanisms:
Sensitive routes have proper security controls in place.
The codebase implements several security measures:
- Extension lock mechanism through
ExtensionLockProviderwraps the entire application - Password validation and keyring management for sensitive operations
- Account export/import operations require password verification
- Password caching with expiry for temporary access
The route configuration is well-structured and the sensitive operations are properly guarded at the implementation level rather than at the routing level.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for authentication/protection mechanisms in sensitive route handlers
# Search for authentication checks in component implementations
echo "Checking authentication mechanisms in sensitive components..."
rg -A 5 "isLocked|requirePassword|authenticate|protected" packages/extension-ui/src/
# Search for route protection HOCs or middleware
echo "Checking for route protection mechanisms..."
rg -A 5 "RouteGuard|ProtectedRoute|withAuth" packages/extension-ui/src/
Length of output: 881
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the RouteWrapper component since it wraps all routes
echo "Checking RouteWrapper implementation..."
rg -A 10 "RouteWrapper" packages/extension-ui/src/
# Check for password/authentication state management
echo "Checking for password/authentication state..."
rg -A 10 "password|auth|locked" packages/extension-ui/src/components/
# Check implementation of sensitive components
echo "Checking Export component..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export function Export' packages/extension-ui/src/
echo "Checking password management components..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export function LoginPassword' packages/extension-ui/src/
# Check for any security-related hooks or contexts
echo "Checking for security-related hooks/contexts..."
rg -A 5 "useAuth|AuthContext|SecurityContext" packages/extension-ui/src/
Length of output: 3756
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the extension-base package for authentication mechanisms
echo "Checking extension-base for auth mechanisms..."
rg -A 10 "isAuthenticated|checkPassword|validatePassword" packages/extension-base/src/
# Check for state management related to authentication
echo "Checking state management..."
rg -A 10 "state.*password|state.*auth|state.*locked" packages/extension-ui/src/
# Check the implementation of sensitive components in polkagate
echo "Checking sensitive components in polkagate..."
rg -A 10 "export.*Export|export.*LoginPassword|export.*ForgotPassword" packages/extension-polkagate/src/
# Check for any middleware or guards
echo "Checking for middleware/guards..."
rg -A 10 "before.*render|guard|protect" packages/extension-ui/src/
Length of output: 12397
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for extension lock mechanism
echo "Checking extension lock context..."
rg -A 10 "ExtensionLockContext|useExtensionLock" packages/extension-ui/src/
# Check for authentication hooks or utilities
echo "Checking authentication utilities..."
rg -A 10 "keyring|validateAccount|checkAccount" packages/extension-base/src/
# Check for route access control
echo "Checking route access control..."
rg -A 10 "withAuth|requireAuth|checkAccess" packages/extension-ui/src/
# Check for password validation logic
echo "Checking password validation..."
rg -A 10 "validatePassword|checkPassword|verifyPassword" packages/extension-base/src/background/
Length of output: 43979
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/index.tsx (1)
18-48: Ensure the order of context providers is intentional
The order of context providers can affect how contexts are accessed within the application. Double-check that the nesting order reflects the dependencies between contexts.
Run the following script to search for any context consumers that might be affected by the provider order:
This will help ensure that contexts are provided before they are consumed and that there are no unintended side effects due to provider order.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as we have clear evidence of the context dependencies:
The current provider order is correct and intentional
The nesting order of context providers aligns with their dependencies:
- AccountAssetProvider (innermost) depends on multiple contexts: AccountContext, GenesisHashOptionsContext, AlertContext, UserAddedChainContext, and WorkerContext
- MediaProvider depends on SettingsContext
- RequestsProvider depends on ActionContext
The current order ensures that all required contexts are available to their consumers, with base providers (Action, Settings, etc.) wrapping dependent providers. No circular dependencies or incorrect ordering issues were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find components consuming contexts to verify provider order.
# List all useContext hooks and their corresponding contexts
rg --type tsx 'useContext\((\w+)Context\)' -o --replace '$1Context'
# List all context providers to cross-reference
rg --type tsx 'export const (\w+) = createContext' -o --replace '$1'
Length of output: 196
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for context usage patterns without file type restriction
echo "=== Context Consumers ==="
rg 'useContext\((\w+)Context\)' -g '*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}'
echo -e "\n=== Context Providers ==="
rg 'export const \w+Context = createContext' -g '*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}'
echo -e "\n=== Provider Dependencies ==="
# Look for imports between context providers
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx --exec grep -l "import.*Provider" {}
Length of output: 22600
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for context definitions and their dependencies
echo "=== Context Definitions ==="
rg "createContext.*Provider" -A 5 -g '*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/
echo -e "\n=== Provider Value Dependencies ==="
# Look for dependencies between providers in their implementation
for provider in ActionProvider SettingsProvider AccountIconThemeProvider GenesisHashOptionsProvider WorkerProvider AccountProvider ApiProvider AlertProvider FetchingProvider CurrencyProvider ReferendaProvider RequestsProvider MediaProvider UserAddedChainsProvider AccountAssetProvider; do
echo "=== $provider Dependencies ==="
rg "const.*use.*Context.*=.*useContext" -A 2 "packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/$provider.tsx" || true
done
Length of output: 7614
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for context dependencies in provider implementations
echo "=== Provider Implementation Dependencies ==="
for file in $(fd "Provider\.tsx$" packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/); do
echo -e "\n=== File: $file ==="
# Look for useContext usage
rg "useContext" "$file" -B 2 -A 2 || true
# Look for imports of other contexts
rg "import.*Context" "$file" || true
done
# Look for initialization order requirements in provider values
echo -e "\n=== Provider Value Dependencies ==="
for file in $(fd "Provider\.tsx$" packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/); do
echo -e "\n=== File: $file ==="
# Extract the provider's value object
rg "value\s*=\s*{[^}]*}" "$file" -A 10 || true
done
Length of output: 17243
packages/extension-ui/src/Popup/contexts/RequestsProvider.tsx (1)
16-78: Solid implementation of the RequestsProvider component
The component effectively manages request subscriptions and routing logic. The use of context and state management aligns with React best practices, enhancing modularity and maintainability.
close: #1675
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
AccountAssetProvider,AccountIconThemeProvider,AccountProvider,ActionProvider,AlertProvider,ApiProvider,CurrencyProvider,FetchingProvider,GenesisHashOptionsProvider,MediaProvider,ReferendaProvider,RequestsProvider,SettingsProvider,UserAddedChainsProvider, andWorkerProvider.Refactor
Popupcomponent for better organization and maintainability by consolidating context providers.Routescomponent, enhancing export simplicity.Bug Fixes
Routescomponent to improve performance.extension-uimodule from the build process, streamlining project compilation.