Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: added tests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart #2655

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: develop-postgres
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

xkaper001
Copy link

@xkaper001 xkaper001 commented Nov 24, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Unittest for lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart

Issue Number:

Fixes #2622

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

Snapshots/Videos:

image

image

Summary

This PR includes unit tests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Introduced new test cases for the OrganizationFeed widget to enhance testing coverage.
      • Verified that the Floating Action Button correctly navigates to the add post screen.
      • Assessed UI behavior when scrolling, ensuring counters reset properly without displaying loading indicators.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce two new test cases in the organization_feed_test.dart file, which enhance the testing coverage for the OrganizationFeed widget. The first test checks the functionality of the Floating Action Button (FAB) to ensure it navigates to the correct screen upon being clicked. The second test validates that pagination counters reset correctly when scrolling occurs, confirming that no loading indicators are displayed during this action.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed_test.dart Added two test cases: one for FAB navigation and another for pagination reset during scrolling.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Write unittests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart (2622)

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • noman2002

🐰 In the fields where bunnies play,
New tests hop in to save the day!
With buttons pressed and counters checked,
Our code's now strong, all bugs deflect!
So let us cheer, with joy we sing,
For robust tests, our hearts take wing! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed_test.dart (2)

289-304: Consider enhancing FAB test coverage

The test correctly verifies the basic FAB navigation functionality. However, consider adding these scenarios:

  • Verify FAB is enabled and visible
  • Test error handling during navigation

Add these assertions before tapping the FAB:

 final fabFinder = find.byKey(const Key('floating_action_btn'));
 expect(fabFinder, findsOneWidget);
+final fab = tester.widget<FloatingActionButton>(fabFinder);
+expect(fab.onPressed, isNotNull);
+expect(fab.enabled, isTrue);
 await tester.tap(fabFinder);

306-327: Enhance scroll behavior test robustness

The test effectively verifies the core scroll behavior. Consider these improvements:

  1. Replace magic number (-200) with a named constant
  2. Add initial state verification
  3. Test different scroll directions

Here's how to enhance the test:

+      const scrollOffset = -200.0; // Scroll up by 200 pixels
+      
+      // Verify initial state
+      expect(find.byType(CircularProgressIndicator), findsNothing);
+      
       // Simulate Scroll within content (not at edge)
       await tester.drag(
         find.byKey(const Key('listView')),
-        const Offset(0, -200),
+        const Offset(0, scrollOffset),
       );
       await tester.pumpAndSettle();
+      
+      // Test scroll in opposite direction
+      await tester.drag(
+        find.byKey(const Key('listView')),
+        const Offset(0, -scrollOffset), // Scroll down
+      );
+      await tester.pumpAndSettle();
+      
+      // Verify state after both scrolls
       expect(find.byType(CircularProgressIndicator), findsNothing);
       verifyNever(mockViewModel.nextPage());
       verifyNever(mockViewModel.previousPage());
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 12b08da and 47c7047.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed_test.dart (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed_test.dart (1)

288-327: Verify complete test coverage as per PR objectives

The new tests add valuable coverage for FAB navigation and scroll behavior. To ensure we meet the PR objective of 100% coverage:

  1. Run coverage report to verify all methods in organization_feed.dart are tested
  2. Check coverage of referenced widgets
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the test coverage by analyzing the implementation and test files.


Based on the analysis of the implementation and test files, I can now generate the final response:

Test coverage is comprehensive and aligned with PR objectives

The test suite provides thorough coverage of the OrganizationFeed widget's functionality:

  • Core UI elements: AppBar, organization name, menu icon
  • Loading states with CircularProgressIndicator
  • Empty state handling with "no posts" message
  • Post list and pinned post rendering
  • Scroll behavior: edge detection, counter resets
  • Pull-to-refresh functionality
  • FloatingActionButton navigation
  • All user interactions: taps, scrolls, refreshes

The new tests complement existing coverage by verifying:

  1. FloatingActionButton navigation to add post screen
  2. Scroll behavior for non-edge scenarios
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test coverage for organization feed

# Find the source file
fd -t f "organization_feed.dart" -E "test"

# Find any untested methods using ast-grep
ast-grep --pattern 'class OrganizationFeed {
  $$$
  $method($_) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

# Find referenced widgets
rg "import.*widgets.*" lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart

Length of output: 374


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check implementation details of OrganizationFeed
cat lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart

# Check test file for coverage
cat test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed_test.dart

# Check referenced widgets for their usage
cat lib/widgets/pinned_post.dart
cat lib/widgets/post_list_widget.dart

Length of output: 26578

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.67%. Comparing base (12b08da) to head (df89179).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2655      +/-   ##
====================================================
+ Coverage             95.59%   95.67%   +0.08%     
====================================================
  Files                   187      187              
  Lines                  9887     9887              
====================================================
+ Hits                   9451     9459       +8     
+ Misses                  436      428       -8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant