-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 465
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: added tests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart #2655
base: develop-postgres
Are you sure you want to change the base?
test: added tests for lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart #2655
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce two new test cases in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
Other🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed_test.dart (2)
289-304
: Consider enhancing FAB test coverageThe test correctly verifies the basic FAB navigation functionality. However, consider adding these scenarios:
- Verify FAB is enabled and visible
- Test error handling during navigation
Add these assertions before tapping the FAB:
final fabFinder = find.byKey(const Key('floating_action_btn')); expect(fabFinder, findsOneWidget); +final fab = tester.widget<FloatingActionButton>(fabFinder); +expect(fab.onPressed, isNotNull); +expect(fab.enabled, isTrue); await tester.tap(fabFinder);
306-327
: Enhance scroll behavior test robustnessThe test effectively verifies the core scroll behavior. Consider these improvements:
- Replace magic number (-200) with a named constant
- Add initial state verification
- Test different scroll directions
Here's how to enhance the test:
+ const scrollOffset = -200.0; // Scroll up by 200 pixels + + // Verify initial state + expect(find.byType(CircularProgressIndicator), findsNothing); + // Simulate Scroll within content (not at edge) await tester.drag( find.byKey(const Key('listView')), - const Offset(0, -200), + const Offset(0, scrollOffset), ); await tester.pumpAndSettle(); + + // Test scroll in opposite direction + await tester.drag( + find.byKey(const Key('listView')), + const Offset(0, -scrollOffset), // Scroll down + ); + await tester.pumpAndSettle(); + + // Verify state after both scrolls expect(find.byType(CircularProgressIndicator), findsNothing); verifyNever(mockViewModel.nextPage()); verifyNever(mockViewModel.previousPage());
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed_test.dart
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed_test.dart (1)
288-327
: Verify complete test coverage as per PR objectives
The new tests add valuable coverage for FAB navigation and scroll behavior. To ensure we meet the PR objective of 100% coverage:
- Run coverage report to verify all methods in
organization_feed.dart
are tested - Check coverage of referenced widgets
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the test coverage by analyzing the implementation and test files.
Based on the analysis of the implementation and test files, I can now generate the final response:
Test coverage is comprehensive and aligned with PR objectives
The test suite provides thorough coverage of the OrganizationFeed
widget's functionality:
- Core UI elements: AppBar, organization name, menu icon
- Loading states with CircularProgressIndicator
- Empty state handling with "no posts" message
- Post list and pinned post rendering
- Scroll behavior: edge detection, counter resets
- Pull-to-refresh functionality
- FloatingActionButton navigation
- All user interactions: taps, scrolls, refreshes
The new tests complement existing coverage by verifying:
- FloatingActionButton navigation to add post screen
- Scroll behavior for non-edge scenarios
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test coverage for organization feed
# Find the source file
fd -t f "organization_feed.dart" -E "test"
# Find any untested methods using ast-grep
ast-grep --pattern 'class OrganizationFeed {
$$$
$method($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Find referenced widgets
rg "import.*widgets.*" lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart
Length of output: 374
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check implementation details of OrganizationFeed
cat lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart
# Check test file for coverage
cat test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed_test.dart
# Check referenced widgets for their usage
cat lib/widgets/pinned_post.dart
cat lib/widgets/post_list_widget.dart
Length of output: 26578
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2655 +/- ##
====================================================
+ Coverage 95.59% 95.67% +0.08%
====================================================
Files 187 187
Lines 9887 9887
====================================================
+ Hits 9451 9459 +8
+ Misses 436 428 -8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Unittest for
lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart
Issue Number:
Fixes #2622
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
Summary
This PR includes unit tests for
lib/views/after_auth_screens/feed/organization_feed.dart
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit