import galician translations #19
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new script Changes
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@JarbasAl has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 58 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
scripts/sync_translations.py (2)
1-3: TODO comment needs clarificationThe TODO comment is vague and doesn't specify what actions need to be taken before PR merge.
Consider adding more detailed requirements or removing the TODO if it's no longer needed.
9-10: Consider making paths configurableThe hardcoded paths might cause issues if the directory structure changes.
Consider making these paths configurable through environment variables or command-line arguments:
-locale = f"{dirname(dirname(__file__))}/skill_randomness/locale" -tx = f"{dirname(dirname(__file__))}/translations" +SKILL_ROOT = os.getenv('SKILL_ROOT', dirname(dirname(__file__))) +locale = os.path.join(SKILL_ROOT, "skill_randomness/locale") +tx = os.path.join(SKILL_ROOT, "translations")translations/gl-es/intents.json (1)
6-10: Consider adding more variations for dice rollingThe dice rolling intent could benefit from more natural language variations.
Consider adding common phrases like:
"/intents/roll-single-die.intent": [ "lanza (un| ) dado", "lanza un dado", "lanza dados de {faces} caras", "lanza un dado de {faces} caras" + "tira un dado", + "tira un dado de {faces} caras" ],
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
scripts/sync_translations.py(1 hunks)skill.json(2 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/choice-result.dialog(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/coin-result.dialog(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/die-result.dialog(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/first-choice.dialog(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/fortune-query.dialog(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/fortune-result.dialog(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/multiple-die-result.dialog(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/number-range-not-specified.dialog(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/number-result.dialog(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/over-dice-limit.dialog(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/second-choice.dialog(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/intents/flip-a-coin.intent(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/intents/fortune-teller.intent(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/intents/make-a-choice.intent(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/intents/pick-a-number.intent(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/intents/roll-multiple-dice.intent(1 hunks)skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/intents/roll-single-die.intent(1 hunks)translations/gl-es/dialogs.json(1 hunks)translations/gl-es/intents.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/over-dice-limit.dialog
- skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/intents/flip-a-coin.intent
- skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/multiple-die-result.dialog
- skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/fortune-result.dialog
- skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/intents/make-a-choice.intent
- skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/number-result.dialog
- translations/gl-es/dialogs.json
- skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/number-range-not-specified.dialog
🔇 Additional comments (11)
skill.json (3)
3-3: Verify the updated repository URL is accessible
The URL has been standardized to follow the new naming convention.
✅ Verification successful
URL is accessible and valid
The repository URL https://github.com/OpenVoiceOS/ovos-skill-randomness returns a 200 OK status code, confirming it's a valid and accessible GitHub repository.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the repository URL is accessible and returns 200 OK
curl -I https://github.com/OpenVoiceOS/ovos-skill-randomness
Length of output: 4917
56-56: Verify consistent usage of the new skill name
The skill name has been updated to follow the standardized format.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the skill name consistency across all relevant files.
Based on the verification results, I can now provide the final response:
Skill name is consistently used across the codebase
The skill name "ovos-skill-randomness" is correctly used in:
- setup.py (PYPI_NAME)
- skill.json
- The implementation class RandomnessSkill in init.py
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining occurrences of the old skill name
# that might need updating
echo "Searching for old skill name references..."
rg -i "skill-ovos-randomness" --type yaml --type json
echo "Checking setup.py for package name..."
fd -e py "setup.py" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 3437
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any references to skill name in various forms
echo "Checking for skill name references in all files..."
rg -i "randomness" --type json --type yaml --type python -l
echo "Checking manifest files..."
fd -e json "manifest.json" --exec cat {}
echo "Checking __init__.py for skill class name..."
fd -e py "__init__.py" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 5237
Line range hint 1-63: Consider adding language-specific fields for Galician support
Given that this PR aims to import Galician translations, consider adding language-specific fields (e.g., title, summary, description, examples) for the Galician locale (gl-es) in this configuration file.
skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/coin-result.dialog (1)
1-2: LGTM! Verify consistency with other locales.
The dialog entries follow the correct pattern with proper template variable usage. The Galician translations are appropriate for coin flip results.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the locale structure and ensure we have a complete picture.
Dialog entries are consistent across locales
The verification confirms that both English (en-us) and Galician (gl-es) locales follow the same pattern:
- Both have two lines for coin flip results
- Both use the {result} template variable consistently
- Both show a contextual line followed by the raw result
- Translations are appropriate for each language ("It landed on" for English, "Foi" for Galician)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other locales follow same pattern
# Expect similar structure across locales
# Find and show content of all coin-result.dialog files
fd "coin-result.dialog" | xargs cat
Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the directory structure of locale files to understand which locales these belong to
fd "coin-result.dialog" -x dirname {}
Length of output: 117
skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/die-result.dialog (1)
1-2: LGTM! Verify consistency with other locales.
The dialog entries follow the correct pattern with proper template variable usage. The Galician translation "Sacaches un" is appropriate for dice roll results.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the file locations to ensure we're correctly interpreting which lines belong to which locale.
Structure and template variables are consistent across locales ✓
The Galician (gl-es) translation in die-result.dialog perfectly matches the structure of its English (en-us) counterpart:
- Both have exactly 2 lines
- Both use the same template variable
{result} - Both follow the pattern of a sentence followed by raw result
- The translation is accurate and appropriate
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other locales follow same pattern
# Expect similar structure across locales
# Find and show content of all die-result.dialog files
fd "die-result.dialog" | xargs cat
Length of output: 217
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Show files with their content separately
fd "die-result.dialog" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
cat "$file"
echo -e "\n"
done
Length of output: 1185
skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/intents/pick-a-number.intent (1)
1-1: Verify intent pattern consistency across locales
The intent pattern looks well-formed with proper alternatives and placeholders. Let's verify it matches the pattern structure used in other languages.
✅ Verification successful
The previous output seems to have merged multiple files together. Let's verify the structure more carefully to ensure we see all locales properly separated.
Intent pattern is consistent across locales
The verification shows that the pattern structure is consistent between English (en-us) and Galician (gl-es) versions:
- Both use three alternative verbs in parentheses
- Both maintain the same placeholder structure with {lower} and {upper}
- Both follow the same grammatical pattern: "(verbs) number between {lower} and {upper}"
- The only differences are the expected translations of the words
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare intent patterns across different locales
# Expected: Similar pattern structure with translated words
# Find and display all pick-a-number.intent files
fd "pick-a-number.intent" "skill_randomness/locale" --exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 187
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the file structure more carefully to ensure we're seeing all locales
fd "pick-a-number.intent" "skill_randomness/locale" --exec echo "=== {} ===" \; --exec cat {} \;
# Also list all locale directories to ensure we're not missing any
ls -la skill_randomness/locale/
Length of output: 600
skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/second-choice.dialog (1)
1-2: LGTM! Translations follow proper structure and patterns
The Galician translations are well-structured and provide good natural language variations. The files follow the correct locale directory structure and maintain consistency in terminology and patterns.
skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/choice-result.dialog (1)
1-2: LGTM! Verify Galician grammar and punctuation.
The dialog patterns look well-structured with proper placeholder usage for {choice}. Both translations provide good variety in responses:
- "Sen dúbida {choice}." (Without doubt {choice})
- "Unha escolla difícil. Mais imos escoller {choice}!" (A difficult choice. But we will choose {choice}!)
Consider having a native Galician speaker verify the grammar and punctuation.
skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/intents/roll-multiple-dice.intent (1)
1-2: LGTM! Well-structured intent patterns.
The patterns properly handle:
- Plural/singular forms with (dados|dado)
- Number of dice with {number}
- Number of faces with {faces}
translations/gl-es/intents.json (1)
14-16: Verify variable naming consistency
The intent uses variables {lower} and {upper}. Ensure these match the variable names expected by the skill's code.
✅ Verification successful
Variable names in the intent match the implementation
The variables {lower} and {upper} in the intent file correctly match the implementation. The skill's code in skill_randomness/__init__.py extracts these values as lower_bound = message.data.get("lower", "") and upper_bound = message.data.get("upper", ""), where "lower" and "upper" are the variable names without the curly braces, which is the correct format for intent variables.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check variable names in the skill code
rg -g '!translations/*' -g '!locale/*' '{lower}|{upper}' .
Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the skill implementation to check variable names
rg -g '!translations/*' -g '!locale/*' "pick-a-number" .
Length of output: 234
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of the intent handler in the Python file
cat ./skill_randomness/__init__.py
Length of output: 4828
skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/fortune-query.dialog (1)
1-2: Dialog translations look good!
The Galician translations maintain the appropriate tone and meaning while being grammatically correct.
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| Dime (o |un |o meu | a miña) (futuro|fortuna) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Fix spacing inconsistencies in both locale intent patterns
Both locale files have spacing inconsistencies in their patterns that should be standardized:
en-us:(the |a |my |)has trailing spaces in alternativesgl-es:(o |un |o meu | a miña)has trailing spaces in alternatives
# en-us/intents/fortune-teller.intent
-Tell me (the |a |my |)(future|fortune)
+Tell me (the|a|my|)(future|fortune)
# gl-es/intents/fortune-teller.intent
-Dime (o |un |o meu | a miña) (futuro|fortuna)
+Dime (o|un|o meu|a miña) (futuro|fortuna)🔗 Analysis chain
Fix spacing in pattern alternatives.
There's an extra space after "a miña" in the pattern alternatives which may cause inconsistent matching.
-Dime (o |un |o meu | a miña) (futuro|fortuna)
+Dime (o|un|o meu|a miña) (futuro|fortuna)🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other locales follow similar intent patterns
# Expect consistent pattern structure across locales
# Find and show content of all fortune-teller.intent files
fd "fortune-teller.intent" | xargs cat
Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the directory structure to understand locale organization better
fd "fortune-teller.intent" -l
Length of output: 247
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine each file separately to properly see the content formatting
echo "=== English (en-us) version ==="
cat ./skill_randomness/locale/en-us/intents/fortune-teller.intent
echo -e "\n=== Galician (gl-es) version ==="
cat ./skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/intents/fortune-teller.intent
Length of output: 373
| Cal é a túa primeira opción? | ||
| Vale. Cal é a primeira escolla? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Fix formatting in first-choice.dialog files
The files appear to have formatting issues:
- The gl-es and en-us variations are merged into single lines
- Missing proper line breaks between dialog variations
Locations needing attention:
skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/first-choice.dialog: Should have two linesskill_randomness/locale/en-us/dialog/first-choice.dialog: Should have two lines
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify dialog variations across locales
The dialog variations provide good natural language flexibility. Let's verify the number of variations matches other languages.
Let me check the actual content of these files to compare the dialog variations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare number of dialog variations across locales
# Expected: Similar number of variations per locale
# Find and count lines in all first-choice.dialog files
fd "first-choice.dialog" "skill_randomness/locale" --exec wc -l {} \;
Length of output: 188
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Show content of first-choice.dialog files across locales
fd "first-choice.dialog" "skill_randomness/locale" --exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 183
| Cal é a túa segunda opción? | ||
| Vale. Agora cal é a segunda opción? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Terminology inconsistency found in dialog files
The verification reveals inconsistent terminology usage across the dialog files:
first-choice.dialogmixes "opción" and "escolla"second-choice.dialoguses only "opción"choice-result.dialoguses "escolla"
This inconsistency in terminology between "opción" and "escolla" should be unified for better user experience and localization quality.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify dialog flow and terminology consistency
The dialog variations maintain consistency with first-choice.dialog and use consistent terminology ("opción"). Let's verify the complete dialog flow across files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check terminology consistency across dialog files
# Expected: Consistent use of terms like "opción" and "escolla"
# Search for terminology usage across dialog files
echo "Checking terminology consistency:"
rg -i "opción|escolla" "skill_randomness/locale/gl-es/dialog/"
Length of output: 603
| @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | |||
| lanza (un| ) dado | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove duplicate intent pattern.
The patterns "lanza (un| ) dado" and "lanza un dado" are redundant since the first pattern already covers both cases with its optional "un" specified by (un| ).
lanza (un| ) dado
lanza dados de {faces} caras
-lanza un dado
lanza un dado de {faces} carasAlso applies to: 3-3
| lanza (un| ) dado | ||
| lanza dados de {faces} caras | ||
| lanza un dado | ||
| lanza un dado de {faces} caras |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Intent patterns for Galician dice rolling could be enhanced
Looking at the patterns across the locale files, I can confirm that the Galician (gl-es) dice rolling intents could benefit from additional patterns to match the natural language variations:
- Add "tira" variations as it's a common verb for throwing/tossing in Galician:
tira (un| ) dado tira un dado de {faces} caras - Add patterns with inverted word order which is natural in Galician:
un dado (lanza|tira) un dado de {faces} caras (lanza|tira)
The current patterns are functional but could be more comprehensive to better match natural Galician language usage patterns.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify intent pattern coverage.
The patterns cover:
- Rolling a single die without faces specified
- Rolling dice with specific faces
- Rolling a single die with specific faces
However, consider if you need patterns for:
- Throwing/tossing variations (e.g., "tira un dado")
- Different word orders natural in Galician
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for similar patterns in other locales for consistency
rg -t txt "dado" skill_randomness/locale/
Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check all files in the locale directory to understand the pattern coverage across languages
fd . skill_randomness/locale/ --type f -x cat {}
Length of output: 2140
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| lanza {number} (dados|dado) | |||
| lanza {number} (dados|dado) de {faces} caras | |||
| lanza {number} de {faces} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify ambiguous intent pattern.
The pattern "lanza {number} de {faces}" is ambiguous as it omits the word "dado/dados". This could lead to confusion in natural language processing.
-lanza {number} de {faces}
+lanza {number} dados de {faces} caras📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| lanza {number} de {faces} | |
| lanza {number} dados de {faces} caras |
| if os.path.isfile(intents): | ||
| with open(intents) as f: | ||
| data = json.load(f) | ||
| for fid, samples in data.items(): | ||
|
|
||
| if samples: | ||
| os.makedirs(f"{locale}/{lang.lower()}", exist_ok=True) | ||
| samples = [s.strip() for s in samples | ||
| if s and s.strip() != "[UNUSED]"] # s may be None | ||
| p = f"{locale}/{lang.lower()}/{fid.lstrip('/')}" | ||
| os.makedirs(dirname(p), exist_ok=True) | ||
| with open(p, "w") as f: | ||
| f.write("\n".join(sorted(samples))) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor duplicate code blocks
There's significant code duplication in the file processing blocks. This makes maintenance difficult and increases the chance of bugs.
Consider refactoring into a common function:
def process_translation_file(file_path: str, locale_dir: str, lang: str) -> None:
"""Process a translation file and write samples to corresponding locale files.
Args:
file_path: Path to the translation JSON file
locale_dir: Base locale directory
lang: Language code
"""
if not os.path.isfile(file_path):
return
try:
with open(file_path) as f:
data = json.load(f)
except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
print(f"Error parsing {file_path}: {e}")
return
for fid, samples in data.items():
if not samples:
continue
os.makedirs(f"{locale_dir}/{lang.lower()}", exist_ok=True)
samples = [s.strip() for s in samples if s and s.strip() != "[UNUSED]"]
p = f"{locale_dir}/{lang.lower()}/{fid.lstrip('/')}"
os.makedirs(dirname(p), exist_ok=True)
with open(p, "w") as f:
f.write("\n".join(sorted(samples)))
# Usage
for lang in os.listdir(tx):
for file_type in ['intents', 'dialogs', 'vocabs', 'regexes']:
file_path = f"{tx}/{lang}/{file_type}.json"
process_translation_file(file_path, locale, lang)Also applies to: 33-45, 47-59, 61-73
| import json | ||
| from os.path import dirname | ||
| import os | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add type hints and error handling
The script lacks type hints and proper error handling for file operations and JSON parsing.
Add type hints and try-except blocks:
from typing import Dict, List
import json
from json.decoder import JSONDecodeError
from os.path import dirname
import os
import sys
from pathlib import Path
|
included in #20 |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation