Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Tutorials “tutorial-for-dprng” #195

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

behoppe
Copy link
Member

@behoppe behoppe commented Dec 9, 2022

Automatically generated by Netlify CMS

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 9, 2022

Deploy Preview for sage-licorice-6da44d ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 7677dc1
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/sage-licorice-6da44d/deploys/6393b042802ebd00083a97db
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-195--sage-licorice-6da44d.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@behoppe
Copy link
Member Author

behoppe commented Dec 12, 2022

Thanks @timkaler for this draft article. Since you mentioned it's generated by AI, I wasn't sure whether to take it seriously, but I do think there's good content here. I think we might want to reconsider how we position it within the overall site. For example, the Monte Carlo code illustrates cilk_for and cilk_reducer. Right now the site lacks (any?) cilk_for documentation, and I would argue that's a huge gap. What do you think about using this content to help with that? (On a similar note, the site has reference material for reducers, but it lacks a complete and well-motivated example, which might fit into a tutorial or user's guide. We might also use this content to address that?)

@ailiop, I think you are working on our cilk_for documentation, and I am also curious what you think about this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants