Update repo component tests

[Yiling-J]

What is this feature?

Add more tests to repo component.

Why do we need this feature?

[Add a description of the problem the feature is trying to solve.]

Who is this feature for?

[Add information on what kind of user the feature is for.]

Which issue(s) does this PR fix?:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

MR Summary:

The summary is added by @codegpt.

This Merge Request (MR) focuses on enhancing the repo component tests within the project. It introduces additional tests covering various functionalities such as creating, updating, deleting repositories, and files, alongside handling large file storage (LFS), mirroring, and runtime frameworks. Key updates include:

1. Addition of comprehensive test cases for repo component functionalities.
2. Implementation of mock scenarios for user permissions and repository relations.
3. Introduction of tests for file operations including LFS support and file uploads.
4. Expansion of tests to cover repository mirroring and runtime framework listings.

The MR significantly broadens the test coverage for the repo component, ensuring more robust and error-free functionalities.

[starship-github]

Linter Issue Report

During the code review, a list issues were found. These issues could affect the code quality, maintainability, and consistency. Below is the detailed Linter issue report:

component/repo_test.go

Lint Issue: undefined: getTagScopeByRepoType

• Location: Line 327, Column 70
• Actionable Suggestion: It appears that the function getTagScopeByRepoType is being called but is not defined or imported in your test file. Ensure that you have defined this function within your test file or imported the package that contains this function.

Lint Issue: undefined: getTagScopeByRepoType

• Location: Line 329, Column 73
• Actionable Suggestion: Similar to the previous issue, the function getTagScopeByRepoType is not recognized. Double-check that you have correctly defined or imported this function.

Lint Issue: undefined: GitAttributesFileName

• Location: Line 399, Column 17
• Actionable Suggestion: The variable GitAttributesFileName is not recognized. Ensure that you have declared this variable or imported the package that contains it. This variable should hold the name of the Git attributes file, typically .gitattributes.

Lint Issue: undefined: minio

• Location: Line 405, Column 105
• Actionable Suggestion: The minio package seems to be referenced but not imported. Make sure to import the MinIO package (github.com/minio/minio-go/v7) at the top of your file if you are intending to use MinIO for object storage operations.

Lint Issue: undefined: getTagScopeByRepoType

• Location: Line 418, Column 70
• Actionable Suggestion: This is another instance where getTagScopeByRepoType is called but not defined or imported. Ensure consistency across your test file regarding function definitions and imports.

Lint Issue: undefined: ErrUnauthorized

• Location: Line 542, Column 22
• Actionable Suggestion: The error ErrUnauthorized is not recognized. Define this error constant in your package or import it from the correct package. This error typically indicates an unauthorized access attempt.

Lint Issue: undefined: ErrUnauthorized

• Location: Line 590, Column 22
• Actionable Suggestion: As with the previous issue, ensure that ErrUnauthorized is correctly defined or imported in your test file. This error is crucial for handling unauthorized access scenarios.

Lint Issue: undefined: ossFileExpireSeconds

• Location: Line 655, Column 39
• Actionable Suggestion: The variable ossFileExpireSeconds seems to be undefined. This variable should specify the expiration time for presigned URLs. Ensure that you have declared this variable with an appropriate value.

Lint Issue: undefined: ossFileExpireSeconds

• Location: Line 768, Column 38
• Actionable Suggestion: This is another reference to ossFileExpireSeconds being undefined. Consistently check across your test file for variable declarations and their correct usage.

Lint Issue: undefined: ErrForbidden

• Location: Line 1615, Column 25
• Actionable Suggestion: The error ErrForbidden is not recognized. This error is typically used to indicate forbidden access. Ensure that you have defined this error constant or imported it from the correct package.

Lint Issue: undefined: ErrForbidden

• Location: Line 1669, Column 26
• Actionable Suggestion: Similar to the previous issue regarding ErrForbidden, ensure that this error is correctly defined or imported to handle forbidden access scenarios effectively.

---

Please make the suggested changes to improve the code quality.

[starship-github]

Possible Issues And Suggestions:

• component/repo_test.go

  • Comments:
    • The error from "GetRepoFileContents" in "TestRepoComponent_CreateFile" is not checked before proceeding.
  • Suggestions:

    if err != nil {
        t.Fatalf("GetRepoFileContents returned error: %v", err)
    }
    

• Line 226 in component/repo_test.go

  • Comments:
    • Potential security risk: direct use of user input "userName" in "mockUserRepoAdminPermission" without validation.

MR Evaluation:

This feature is still under test, evaluation are given by AI and might be inaccurate.

After evaluation, the code changes in the Merge Request get score: 98-100.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

• @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
• @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
• @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
• @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
• @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
  Example:
  • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
  Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  Examples:
  • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation
  for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

About Us:

Visit the OpenCSG StarShip website for the Dashboard and detailed information on CodeReview, CodeGen, and other StarShip modules.

[starship-github]

The StarShip CodeReviewer was triggered but terminated because it encountered an issue: The MR state is not opened.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

• @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
• @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
• @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
• @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
• @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
  Example:
  • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
  Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  Examples:
  • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation
  for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.