Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add testcontainers #187

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

add testcontainers #187

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

Yiling-J
Copy link
Member

@Yiling-J Yiling-J commented Nov 19, 2024

testcontainers will be used for database tests and integration tests.

MR Summary:

The summary is added by @codegpt.

This Merge Request introduces the integration of Testcontainers for database and integration testing across various components of the application. Key changes include the addition of New...WithDB functions to support dependency injection of database connections for testing, the creation of test cases to validate the functionality of these components, and the setup of a Testcontainers-based testing environment in testutils.go.

Key updates:

  1. Added New...WithDB functions in prompt.go, repository.go, tag.go, and user.go to allow passing custom database connections.
  2. Implemented comprehensive test cases in prompt_test.go and user_test.go to verify the behavior of database operations with injected DB connections.
  3. Established a Testcontainers setup in testutils.go for creating isolated database instances for testing.
  4. Integrated Testcontainers into the testing workflow to ensure database and integration tests run against a real PostgreSQL instance.

@Yiling-J Yiling-J requested a review from Rader November 19, 2024 07:39
@starship-github
Copy link

Linter Issue Report

During the code review, a list issues were found. These issues could affect the code quality, maintainability, and consistency. Below is the detailed Linter issue report:

builder/store/database/prompt.go

Lint Issue: undefined: assertAffectedOneRow

  • Location: Line 42, Column 12
  • Code Context:
    if err := assertAffectedOneRow(res, err); err != nil {
  • Actionable Suggestions:
    It appears that the function assertAffectedOneRow is being called but it is not defined anywhere within your project or in the imported packages. Here are a few steps to resolve this issue:
    1. Verify Import: Ensure that you have imported the package containing the assertAffectedOneRow function. If it's supposed to be part of an external library, double-check the library documentation and your import statements.
    2. Define the Function: If assertAffectedOneRow is intended to be a custom function that you've written, make sure it is correctly defined in your project. The definition should be accessible from the file where it's being called.
    3. Check for Typos: It's also possible that there might be a typo in the function name. Verify that the function name is spelled correctly in both the definition and the call.
    4. Example Definition: If you need to define it, here's a simple example of what the function might look like:
      func assertAffectedOneRow(result sql.Result, err error) error {
          if err != nil {
              return err
          }
          rowsAffected, err := result.RowsAffected()
          if err != nil {
              return err
          }
          if rowsAffected != 1 {
              return fmt.Errorf("expected 1 row to be affected, got %d", rowsAffected)
          }
          return nil
      }
    Implement or correct the function based on your project's requirements.
common/tests/testutils.go

Lint Issue: undefined: txdb

  • Location: Line 29, Column 23
  • Code Snippet:
    sqlDB = sql.OpenDB(txdb.New("pg", config.DSN))
  • Suggestion: It seems like the txdb package is not imported or defined in your file. Ensure you have imported the txdb package correctly at the top of your file. If it's a custom package, check that it's correctly defined and accessible within your project scope.

Lint Issue: undefined: testcontainers

  • Location: Line 55, Column 11
  • Code Snippet:
    pc, err := postgres.Run(ctx, "docker.io/postgres:14-alpine", reuse, postgres.WithDatabase("csghub_test"),
  • Suggestion: The testcontainers reference seems to be undefined. Make sure you have imported the testcontainers package correctly. If you're using Go modules, you might need to run go get github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-go to add it to your project dependencies.

Lint Issue: undefined: testcontainers

  • Location: Line 56, Column 13
  • Code Snippet:
    testcontainers.WithWaitStrategy(
  • Suggestion: Similar to the previous issue, this indicates that the testcontainers package is not recognized. Verify your import statements and ensure that the testcontainers package is correctly imported and installed in your project.

Lint Issue: undefined: testcontainers

  • Location: Line 64, Column 3
  • Code Snippet:
    reuse := testcontainers.CustomizeRequestOption(
  • Suggestion: This is another instance where testcontainers is not recognized. As with the previous suggestions, ensure that you have correctly imported the testcontainers package and that it's available in your project's dependencies.

Please make the suggested changes to improve the code quality.

@Yiling-J Yiling-J merged commit 2edcaa7 into main Nov 19, 2024
0 of 4 checks passed
@Yiling-J Yiling-J deleted the feature/testcontainers branch November 19, 2024 07:41
@starship-github
Copy link

Possible Issues And Suggestions:

  • builder/store/database/prompt_test.go
    • Comments:
      • The test 'TestPromptStore_Delete' expects an error when deleting a non-existent prompt, which might not align with typical delete operation expectations.
  • common/tests/testutils.go
    • Comments:
      • Panic should be avoided in test setup. Consider returning an error and handling it gracefully.
    • Suggestions:
      // Replace panic with error handling
      if err != nil {
        return nil, err
      }
      

MR Evaluation:

This feature is still under test, evaluation are given by AI and might be inaccurate.

After evaluation, the code changes in the Merge Request get score: 91-100.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

  • @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
  • @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
  • @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
  • @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
  • @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
    Example:
    • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
    Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
    Examples:
    • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation
    for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

About Us:

Visit the OpenCSG StarShip website for the Dashboard and detailed information on CodeReview, CodeGen, and other StarShip modules.

@starship-github
Copy link

The StarShip CodeReviewer was triggered but terminated because it encountered an issue: The MR state is not opened.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

  • @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
  • @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
  • @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
  • @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
  • @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
    Example:
    • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
    Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
    Examples:
    • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation
    for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

1 similar comment
@starship-github
Copy link

The StarShip CodeReviewer was triggered but terminated because it encountered an issue: The MR state is not opened.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

  • @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
  • @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
  • @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
  • @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
  • @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
    Example:
    • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
    Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
    Examples:
    • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation
    for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

ganisback pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
* add golintci yaml

* add testcontainers

---------

Co-authored-by: yiling <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants