off grid technologies update #113
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Dear Onsset team,
I have been working in the onsset code for a while mainly focusing on: Make the calculate_off_grid_lcoes method flexible to work with more technologies issue. At the moment this version is able to add or remove off-grid technologies at will. To do this, a new python file has been created (technologies.py), in this file you can add technologies or remove them. It maintains the structure of the previous version but now it is possible to differentiate technologies by changing the 'name'. This name will be maintain throughout the hole calculation. In addition, I have make the code more compact through iteration of the new technology list created in technologies.py. The file runner_Bolivia.py is the one that i used to run onsset. also an example is store in Bolivia folder. The data is taken from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.02.009.
Looking forward to hear your feedback
Regards,
Sergio