Rebased dry deposition

[rosiealice]

Description of changes

Replaces #88 after that branch was rebasd to more recent version of CTSM.

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any:

CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):

Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)?

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?

Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so?

Testing performed, if any:
(List what testing you did to show your changes worked as expected)
(This can be manual testing or running of the different test suites)
(Documentation on system testing is here: https://github.com/ESCOMP/ctsm/wiki/System-Testing-Guide)
(aux_clm on derecho for intel/gnu and izumi for intel/gnu/nag/nvhpc is the standard for tags on master)

NOTE: Be sure to check your coding style against the standard
(https://github.com/ESCOMP/ctsm/wiki/CTSM-coding-guidelines) and review
the list of common problems to watch out for
(https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/wiki/List-of-common-problems).

[rosiealice]

I have been doing a lot of investigation into the biases between the CLM-SP and FATES-SP dry deposition. Using the default modes for both models gives high biases.
e.g. for O3

and for SO2

and or NH3

The TL:DR version of this is that the differences between the models can be at least in part attributed to a combination of

• zengwang vs meier z0 parameterization
• using the twostream (preferred) radiation scheme
• adjusting the gas exchange parameter to increase ET over the amazon to values more like CLM6-SP (the impact of this change is of course somewhat subjective, and likely could/will be improved by using adrianna's calibration)
• Changing the comparison with CLM6-SP to NOT use biomass heat storage, which is not (yet) compatible with FATES and does lots of stuff to the boundary layer turbulence calculations
• Increasing the z0 parameter for tropical forests to 0.075 (for some reason these are all the same value in FATES but they vary in CLM)

The best comparison I found so far looks like this.

I think these are likely all within the tolerances of the impact of the flux calibration.

[rosiealice]

Need to change the configuration from meier2022 to zengwang