atf: 0.21-unstable-2021-09-01 -> 0.22-unstable-2024-12-26

[Bot-wxt1221]

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/5020

[reckenrode]

Please include a link to the release notes per the contributing guidelines. Also, please revert to 0.22 with patches to fix the failing test. The reason why this package used an unstable commit before is because a release had not been made in a while, and that is what FreeBSD was using for their build. In general, https://dont-ship.it.

From what I can tell, FreeBSD appears to be shipping ATF 0.22 with the following commit cherry-picked to fix breakage in the test suite: freebsd/atf@b42c986. If that fixes the test failure here, I’d recommend using 0.22 with this patch.

[Bot-wxt1221]

@reckenrode Done.

[Bot-wxt1221]

@ofborg build atf