Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

davinci-resolve: migrate to by-name & 19.1 -> 19.1.1 #362268

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jshcmpbll
Copy link
Member

@jshcmpbll jshcmpbll commented Dec 6, 2024

Migrating davinci-resolve to by-name and also bumping the package version.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@jshcmpbll jshcmpbll added the 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes label Dec 6, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Dec 6, 2024
@jshcmpbll jshcmpbll force-pushed the jc/davinci-resolve-by-name branch from bd2891b to 715d002 Compare December 6, 2024 01:36
@jshcmpbll jshcmpbll force-pushed the jc/davinci-resolve-by-name branch from 715d002 to 4dc808d Compare December 6, 2024 01:46
@pyrox0
Copy link
Member

pyrox0 commented Dec 6, 2024

lgtm, but I can't test it atm since it would need me to build spidermonkey from source.

@wegank wegank added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person label Dec 6, 2024
@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from amarshall December 6, 2024 20:25
@wegank wegank added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Dec 10, 2024
@jshcmpbll jshcmpbll force-pushed the jc/davinci-resolve-by-name branch 2 times, most recently from 4bbce58 to bffb748 Compare December 11, 2024 03:55
@jshcmpbll jshcmpbll removed the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Dec 11, 2024
@wegank wegank removed the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person label Dec 11, 2024
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ buildFHSEnv {
];
text = ''
set -o errexit
drv=pkgs/by-name/da/davinci-resolve/package.nix
drv=pkgs/applications/video/davinci-resolve/default.nix
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems mistaken.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, looks like I made a mistake during my rebase

@jshcmpbll jshcmpbll force-pushed the jc/davinci-resolve-by-name branch from bffb748 to 7e90bfd Compare December 22, 2024 03:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants