fix: upgrade handler for v1.1.0 #1706
Conversation
WalkthroughThe project has implemented an upgrade handler for version 1.1.0 and fixed issues related to it. The changes involve passing additional arguments to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X ? TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- CHANGELOG.md (2 hunks)
- app/upgrades.go (1 hunks)
- app/upgrades/types.go (1 hunks)
- app/upgrades/v1_1_0/constants.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- CHANGELOG.md
Additional comments: 4
app/upgrades.go (1)
- 21-25: <!--Monologue:
Thought 1: Thergcommand has successfully found references toCreateUpgradeHandlerin the codebase, which confirms its existence.
Reflect 1: The output shows thatCreateUpgradeHandleris indeed present and used inapp/upgrades.go,app/upgrades/types.go, andapp/upgrades/v1_1_0/constants.go.Thought 2: The output from
app/upgrades/types.goindicates thatCreateUpgradeHandleris defined as a function type that takes a*module.Managerandmodule.Configuratoras parameters, which aligns with the PR's description.
Reflect 2: This confirms that the function signature has been updated to include the new parameters as intended.Thought 3: The output from
app/upgrades/v1_1_0/constants.goshows an actual function definition that matches the new signature, which is also consistent with the PR's objective.
Reflect 3: This suggests that theCreateUpgradeHandlerfunction is properly defined to handle the upgrade process with the new parameters.Thought 4: The output from
app/upgrades.goshows a call toCreateUpgradeHandlerwithapp.mmandapp.configuratoras arguments, which is exactly what was described in the PR summary and the AI-generated summary.
Reflect 4: This confirms that the call toCreateUpgradeHandlerhas been updated to pass the new arguments, and it is consistent with the changes described.Thought 5: With the confirmation of the function's existence, its updated signature, and the updated call, the changes appear to be correctly implemented in the codebase.
Reflect 5: The verification process seems complete, and the changes align with the PR's objectives and the AI-generated summaries.
-->The verification process has confirmed the presence and correct implementation of the
CreateUpgradeHandlerfunction in the codebase. The function signature has been updated to include the new parameters, and the calls to this function have been adjusted accordingly. The changes are consistent with the PR's objectives and the AI-generated summaries.
- The function type is defined in
app/upgrades/types.go.- The function definition with the new signature is present in
app/upgrades/v1_1_0/constants.go.- The call to
CreateUpgradeHandlerwith the new arguments is found inapp/upgrades.go.Analysis chain
The change to the
setUpgradeHandlersfunction correctly addsapp.mmandapp.configuratoras arguments to theCreateUpgradeHandlercall. Ensure that theCreateUpgradeHandlerfunction is defined to accept these new parameters and that all instances where this function is called have been updated accordingly.
The initial verification script did not produce any results, which suggests that the
CreateUpgradeHandlerfunction definition and calls might not match the expected patterns. To ensure that the function is defined with the new parameters and that all calls to it have been updated, I will generate a new script with broader search patterns.
The AST-based search scripts have not produced any results for the definition or calls to
CreateUpgradeHandler. This suggests that the function may not exist in the codebase as expected, or there is a discrepancy that the AST search is not capturing. To confirm the presence ofCreateUpgradeHandlerand its usage, I will userg(ripgrep) to perform a text-based search.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of `CreateUpgradeHandler` to ensure it matches the new signature. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func ($_ *Upgrade) CreateUpgradeHandler($_ *module.Manager, $_ module.Configurator) $_ { $$$ }' # Search for calls to `CreateUpgradeHandler` to ensure they all pass the correct arguments. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'($_ *$_).CreateUpgradeHandler($_, $_)'Length of output: 198
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any definition of `CreateUpgradeHandler` to verify its existence and signature. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func ($_ *Upgrade) CreateUpgradeHandler($$$) $_ { $$$ }' # Search for any calls to `CreateUpgradeHandler` to verify that they are consistent with the new signature. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'($_ *$_).CreateUpgradeHandler($$$)'Length of output: 156
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to search for the string "CreateUpgradeHandler" in the codebase. rg "CreateUpgradeHandler"Length of output: 388
app/upgrades/types.go (1)
- 12-12: The signature of
CreateUpgradeHandlerhas been updated to accept a*module.Managerandmodule.Configurator. Verify that all calls to this function throughout the codebase have been updated to match the new signature.app/upgrades/v1_1_0/constants.go (2)
17-20: The implementation of
CreateUpgradeHandlernow properly returns a non-nilUpgradeHandlerfunction, which should prevent the panic described in the PR's objective. This function uses theRunMigrationsmethod, which is presumably part of the module manager's responsibilities. Ensure thatRunMigrationsis designed to handle the upgrade process as expected and that thectx,cfg, andfromVMparameters are correctly utilized within it.22-23: The addition of
inflationtypes.ModuleNameto theStoreUpgrades.Addedslice appears to be related to the new inflation features. Confirm that this module is intended to be added during the upgrade process and that all necessary preparations for this module's inclusion (like migrations or initializations) are in place.
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1706 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 73.93% 73.94%
=======================================
Files 191 191
Lines 15129 15125 -4
=======================================
- Hits 11186 11184 -2
+ Misses 3289 3287 -2
Partials 654 654
|
* fix: upgrade handler for v1.1.0 * chore: update changelog
Description
Fixes the UpgradeHandler for
v1.1.0. The upgrade handler cannot be nil, or else the chain will panic.Purpose
Upgrade mainnet with inflation
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
v1.1.0upgrade handler to ensure smooth version transitions.Documentation
Refactor