Expand get_decision_problem_results with kwargs

[tengis-nrl]

Tests passing

[github-actions]

Performance Results

Version	Precompile Time
Main	3.291137926
This Branch	3.255503522

Version	Build Time
Main-Build Time Precompile	54.574988168
Main-Build Time Postcompile	2.714479927
This Branch-Build Time Precompile	52.324541887
This Branch-Build Time Postcompile	2.896360294

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 76.92308% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.52%. Comparing base (12288cd) to head (8bd4923).
Report is 20 commits behind head on psy4.

❗ Current head 8bd4923 differs from pull request most recent head 2752563. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2752563 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             psy4    #1060      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.48%   80.52%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         115      115              
  Lines       12403    12411       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         9982     9994      +12     
+ Misses       2421     2417       -4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	80.52% <76.92%> (+0.04%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
src/simulation/simulation_problem_results.jl	83.44% <0.00%> (+2.19%)	⬆️
src/simulation/simulation_results.jl	82.94% <83.33%> (-0.19%)	⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[GabrielKS]

Can you also test that the errors work as expected when we can't find the system file and when we set populate_units without setting populate_system?

[jd-lara]

once this test is implemented we can merge

[tengis-nrl]

Hi @GabrielKS, could you confirm or deny the implementation of the test?

[tengis-nrl]

The test for testing "file not found" error passes