Refactor: Remove issue templates that are now in .github repo

[kellijohnson-NOAA]

What is the feature?

• Moves PR and issue templates to NOAA-FIMS/.github/.github so they are available to all repositories within NOAA-FIMS.

How have you implemented the solution?

Moved the files to NOAA-FIMS/.github/.github see NOAA-FIMS/.github@33c261d for the exact commit.

Does the PR impact any other area of the project?

One template, handbook_addition.md was left as is.

How to test this change

Go to another repository in FIMS and see the available issue templates 🤯 or see below

Developer pre-PR checklist

• I relied on GitHub actions to 🧪 things for me while I sat on the 🛋️.

[Bai-Li-NOAA]

Thanks for removing the templates.

There is a syntax error in the feature_request.yml inthe .github repo, which does not appear in your snapshot or available issue templates in other repos. I will report this issue on the .github repo.

[kellijohnson-NOAA]

Thanks @Bai-Li-NOAA!

[kellijohnson-NOAA]

@Bai-Li-NOAA I just found out that the issue templates in .github will not work in this repository unless we delete the entire folder, i.e., delete NOAA-FIMS/collaborative_workflow/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE, and thus, we need to decide if the [handbook-addition.md](https://github.com/NOAA-FIMS/collaborative_workflow/blob/main/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/handbook-addition.md) is worth migrating over to the .github repository, which would make it show up in every repository or if we should delete this pull request?

[iantaylor-NOAA]

I vote to delete https://github.com/NOAA-FIMS/collaborative_workflow/blob/main/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/handbook-addition.md as it doesn't add much and we can easily create handbook addition issues from a blank issue easily enough now that we've been developing the handbook for a while.