Update eko

[felixhekhorn]

• I hope I caught everything
• @giacomomagni do you have by chance still xspace_bench in your env and can quickly run a benchmark? Otherwise, let's not worry for the moment, I'd say
• there is still the problem with setuptools (see also Problems in installing banana with poetry banana#27): poetry removes it, but then the package fails (the error was again No module named 'pkg_resources')

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #154 (f9a9fac) into develop (2b560c5) will decrease coverage by 1.50%.
The diff coverage is 50.00%.

❗ Current head f9a9fac differs from pull request most recent head b089909. Consider uploading reports for the commit b089909 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #154      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    70.33%   68.83%   -1.51%     
===========================================
  Files           90       82       -8     
  Lines         4258     4008     -250     
===========================================
- Hits          2995     2759     -236     
+ Misses        1263     1249      -14     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	68.83% <50.00%> (-1.51%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...fficient_functions/splitting_functions/__init__.py	37.50% <0.00%> (ø)
src/yadism/output.py	68.44% <50.00%> (-14.81%)	⬇️
src/yadism/esf/scale_variations.py	30.23% <66.66%> (+0.82%)	⬆️
src/yadism/coefficient_functions/light/fl_nc.py	82.35% <0.00%> (-4.61%)	⬇️
src/yadism/coefficient_functions/light/f2_nc.py	85.00% <0.00%> (-3.47%)	⬇️
src/yadism/coefficient_functions/fonll/fl_nc.py	78.08% <0.00%> (-2.17%)	⬇️
src/yadism/coefficient_functions/fonll/f2_nc.py	76.72% <0.00%> (-1.51%)	⬇️
...sm/coefficient_functions/fonll/partonic_channel.py	58.33% <0.00%> (-0.69%)	⬇️
src/yadism/esf/esf.py	48.71% <0.00%> (-0.65%)	⬇️
... and 21 more

[giacomomagni]

Hi Felix, I'll have check if I still have it installed...
I think we can merge #145, where some of the changes are already addressed
(my bad not having done it before...) is it okay ?

[felixhekhorn]

With #145 in the main difference is that I used the eko compatibility layer always since Couplings is an eko object and we can't guarantee at the moment the yadism compatibility layer acts the same (see also #151)