bugfix: fallback to process definition key if process name is missing

[lmoesle]

closes #475

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 58.94%. Comparing base (191543f) to head (047e394).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #476      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     58.85%   58.94%   +0.08%     
- Complexity      205      207       +2     
============================================
  Files           139      139              
  Lines          1383     1386       +3     
  Branches         99      101       +2     
============================================
+ Hits            814      817       +3     
  Misses          537      537              
  Partials         32       32              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	58.94% <100.00%> (+0.08%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[lmoesle]

@DaAnda97 I quickly fixed the bug you discovered yesterday. Instead of throwing an error if a process doesn't have a name, I will show a warning and use the processDefinitionKey instead.

[DaAnda97]

lgtm 👍