Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: rename deployment service to deployment example-service #468

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 18, 2023

Conversation

lmoesle
Copy link
Member

@lmoesle lmoesle commented Dec 18, 2023

Issue

Description

Checklist

  • Code is easy to understand
  • No obvious errors or bugs
  • CI/CD Pipelines did run successfully
  • Tests were implemented
  • Documentation was created

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 18, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (62b9094) 58.21% compared to head (0a916c3) 58.21%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #468   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     58.21%   58.21%           
  Complexity       60       60           
=========================================
  Files            38       38           
  Lines           560      560           
  Branches         50       50           
=========================================
  Hits            326      326           
  Misses          185      185           
  Partials         49       49           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 58.21% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lmoesle lmoesle merged commit 5ca9dc0 into main Dec 18, 2023
2 checks passed
@lmoesle lmoesle deleted the chore/rename-services-to-example branch December 18, 2023 14:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants