Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: lifecycle miranum-deployment #444

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Dec 4, 2023
Merged

Conversation

lmoesle
Copy link
Member

@lmoesle lmoesle commented Dec 1, 2023

Issue

Description

  • Update dependencies
  • Use assertj assertions in tests
  • clean up pom.xmls

Checklist

  • Code is easy to understand
  • No obvious errors or bugs
  • CI/CD Pipelines did run successfully
  • Tests were implemented
  • Documentation was created

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 1, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (d688ae0) 58.21% compared to head (b522b75) 58.21%.

Files Patch % Lines
...ver/properties/DeploymentServerRestProperties.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #444   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     58.21%   58.21%           
  Complexity       60       60           
=========================================
  Files            38       38           
  Lines           560      560           
  Branches         50       50           
=========================================
  Hits            326      326           
  Misses          185      185           
  Partials         49       49           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 58.21% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@DaAnda97 DaAnda97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! 👍
Please have a look at my comments before merging

<groupId>org.hamcrest</groupId>
<artifactId>hamcrest-all</artifactId>
<version>1.3</version>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

magst du die nicht in die parent-pom legen? Die verwendest du oben auch.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nicht jedes Modul hat Spring Boot als Dependency. Deswegen steht das nicht im parent

</resources>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hast du geschaut, ob hier immer noch ein executeable jar rauskommt? Ich hatte das mal, dass das Projekt ohne dem Plugin zwar in IntelliJ gestartet ist, aber das Manifest in der Pom nicht gepasst hat.

@@ -63,7 +59,7 @@
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${maven.compiler.plugin.version}</version>
<version>3.11.0</version>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Welchem Pattern folgst du hier, dass du manche versionen in die props rein nimmst und andere nicht?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alles was ich min. 2 definiere schreibe ich in die Properties, sonst direkt zum Plugin

@lmoesle lmoesle merged commit 62b9094 into main Dec 4, 2023
2 checks passed
@lmoesle lmoesle deleted the chore/update-dependencies branch December 4, 2023 10:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants