Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/es 688 disable bivariates #153

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024

Conversation

StokesMIDE
Copy link
Member

This restores the ability to disable bivariate polynomials, fixes a couple of bugs (bad Transform.isValid() return type in some cases, improved validity check, others), plus a little code cleanup.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 52.63158% with 18 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.62%. Comparing base (3749a5f) to head (86712c2).

Files Patch % Lines
idelib/transforms.py 33.33% 14 Missing ⚠️
idelib/dataset.py 76.47% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #153      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    74.49%   74.62%   +0.13%     
===========================================
  Files           11       11              
  Lines         3787     3791       +4     
===========================================
+ Hits          2821     2829       +8     
+ Misses         966      962       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@StokesMIDE StokesMIDE requested a review from pscheidler June 10, 2024 14:27
Comment on lines +2219 to +2221
# TODO: Remember what `padding` was for, and either implement or
# remove it completely. Related to plotting; see `plots`.
# TODO: Use `iterator`? It may have been removed accidentally.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should these also be Jira tickets? I worry that comments are easier to lose

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should these also be Jira tickets? I worry that comments are easier to lose

These are pretty vague, and neither are critical. I'm not sure it's worth cluttering up Jira; there are already a bunch of old GitHub 'enhancement' issues from different repos, and they sort of drown out the more critical issues.

@StokesMIDE StokesMIDE merged commit bad99c3 into develop Jun 10, 2024
31 checks passed
@StokesMIDE StokesMIDE deleted the feature/ES-688_disable_bivariates branch October 30, 2024 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants