-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding projects for the Bizkaia fiscalization + autogenerated Dtos #219
Conversation
src/Mews.Fiscalizations.All.sln
Outdated
Project("{2150E333-8FDC-42A3-9474-1A3956D46DE8}") = "Bizkaia", "Bizkaia", "{B33E5A1D-A667-477D-9AD8-1673192B71BB}" | ||
EndProject | ||
Project("{FAE04EC0-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}") = "Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia", "Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia\Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.csproj", "{145C287C-2D14-4B35-A73A-6A97ABBF3F10}" | ||
EndProject | ||
Project("{FAE04EC0-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}") = "Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.Tests", "Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.Tests\Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.Tests.csproj", "{2767CE08-C4C2-4043-AC58-C413ECB64D3A}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If i remember correctly, Bizkaia and the other 2 regions share most of the stuff (almost identical XSDs)
so i suggest that we either implement Bizkaia within the same project (Basque), or rename the Basque project to something else like GipuzkoaAndAraba, or having a project per region.
I would go with the first solution (all regions within 1 project).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I will go with option 1 and have all regions in the same project..
src/Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.Tests/Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.Tests.csproj
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.Tests/Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.Tests.csproj
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.Tests/Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.Tests.csproj
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.Tests/Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.Tests.csproj
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.Tests/Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.Tests.csproj
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia/Mews.Fiscalizations.Bizkaia.csproj
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
"tidas_ConSG_AltaPeticion_V1_0_2.xsd")] | ||
[XmlRoot(Namespace = "https://www.batuz.eus/fitxategiak/batuz/LROE/esquemas/LROE_PJ_240_1_1_FacturasEmi" + | ||
"tidas_ConSG_AltaPeticion_V1_0_2.xsd", IsNullable = false)] | ||
public class LROEPJ240FacturasEmitidasConSGAltaPeticion |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's confirm with the research team that only model 240 is applicable in our case.
Description
Adding autogenerated DTOS to support batuz fiscal integration.
Type of change
Checklist
A few other PRs will follow this one with models and unit tests to validate the DTOs.