-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: bump eth-ledger-bridge-keyring
to ^3.0.1
#26498
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
58e440a
chore: update `eth-ledger-bridge-keyring`
mikesposito a1e92c9
chore: remove unused patch
mikesposito e37acf9
deps: fix `axios` audit
mikesposito 028a590
Update LavaMoat policies
metamaskbot aa49c62
fix: add `LedgerOffscreenBridgeOptions` type
mikesposito 230d7c4
Merge branch 'develop' into chore/update-ledger-keyring
mikesposito 4e2909b
refactor: downgrade to `^3.0.1`
mikesposito d95d145
Merge branch 'develop' into chore/update-ledger-keyring
mikesposito a0bfadc
Update LavaMoat policies
metamaskbot 21fd490
chore: remove resolution
mikesposito 5136c2e
Merge branch 'develop' into chore/update-ledger-keyring
mikesposito b2892a7
Merge branch 'develop' into chore/update-ledger-keyring
mikesposito File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
18 changes: 0 additions & 18 deletions
18
.yarn/patches/@metamask-eth-ledger-bridge-keyring-npm-2.0.1-7a5d815b2d.patch
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The patch has been ported upstream
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mikesposito Looks like the change is not present anymore after downgrading this PR to
3.0.1
as it was merged after release of v4? Should the patch be brought back for now?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it all good it was merged without the patch?