Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
[cherry pick] Fix bugs related to queued requests (#28197)
This is a cherry-pick of #28090 for v12.6.0. Original description: <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** Bumps `@metamask/queued-request-controller` to fix queueing issue with Chain Permission `wallet_switchEthereumChain` and `wallet_addEthereumChain` when switching to a previously permitted chain and with `wallet_addEthereumChain` not being enqueued when it still should be. [](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/28090?quickstart=1) ## **Related issues** Related: MetaMask/core#4846 Fixes: #28101 Fixes: #27977 Fixes: #28102 ## **Manual testing steps** The easiest way to test this would be a combination of using the test dapp and the following request to switch chains ``` await window.ethereum.request({ "method": "wallet_switchEthereumChain", "params": [ { chainId: "0x1" } ], }); ``` The behaviors you should see include: **One dapp:** * On a dapp permissioned for chain A and B, on chain A, queue up several send transactions, then use wallet_switchEthereumChain to switch to chain B. The send transactions should NOT get cleared immediately after requesting the chain switch. Chain switch should NOT happen until the previous approvals are approved/rejected. * On a dapp permissioned for chain A and B, on chain A, queue up one send transaction, then use wallet_switchEthereumChain to switch to chain B, then queue up several more send transactions. Reject/approve the first transaction. Afterwards, you should see chain B as the active chain for the dapp, and all subsequent approvals cleared/rejected automatically. * On a dapp permissioned for ONLY chain A, on chain A, queue up one send transaction, then use wallet_switchEthereumChain to switch to chain B, then queue up several more send transactions. Reject/approve the first transaction. Afterwards, you should an approval prompt for adding chain B. If you approve it, the dapp should then be on chain B, with all subsequent approvals cleared/rejected. If you disapprove it, you should be prompted with the subsequent approvals. * On a dapp permissioned for ONLY chain A, on chain A, wallet_switchEthereumChain to switch to chain B, then queue up several more send transactions. Reject/approve the first transaction. Afterwards, you should an approval prompt for adding chain B. If you approve it, the dapp should then be on chain B, with all subsequent approvals cleared/rejected. If you disapprove it, you should be prompted with the subsequent approvals. **Two dapps:** * On a dapp permissioned for chain A, on chain A, queue up several send transactions, On a separate dapp permissioned for chain A and B, on chain A, use wallet_switchEthereumChain to switch to chain B. The send transactions should NOT get cleared immediately after requesting the chain switch. Chain switch should NOT happen until the previous approvals are approved/rejected. * On a dapp permissioned for chain A and B, on chain A, queue up one send transaction. On a separate dapp permissioned for chain A and B, on chain A, use wallet_switchEthereumChain to switch to chain B. Then on the first dapp queue up several more send transactions. Reject/approve the first transaction. Afterwards, you should see chain B as the active chain for the second dapp, and then you should still be prompted with the subsequent approvals for the first dapp. * One one dapp, start a wallet_addEthereumChain for a chain that does not exist in the wallet and leave the approval alone. On a different dapp, do the same thing. Only the request from the first dapp should be accessible (i.e. no scrubbing between both of them). After rejecting the first request, the second request should then appear (which will look exactly the same of course). Wallet should not lock up if you repeat this and accept either of the requests ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2634119f-67db-4866-8520-9320a9400b1d https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c78c13ab-ea4f-4420-bccc-70959786e8db ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: jiexi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <[email protected]>
](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/28090?quickstart=1){kind=link}
- Loading branch information
3 people
authored
Oct 30, 2024
1 parent
ac1173b
commit 334c63c