-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 195
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: use crypto compare multi api for currency rate controller #4852
Conversation
error instanceof Error && | ||
error.message.includes('market does not exist for this coin pair') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unlike the single endpoint, the multi endpoint does not appear to throw if the symbol does not exist. It just ignores that particular symbol and returns the rest. So I don't see anything to catch.
conversionRate: number; | ||
conversionDate: number; | ||
usdConversionRate?: string; | ||
usdConversionRate?: number; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is sort of extra, but these seemed wrongly typed to me. I see everything as numbers. I mainly wanted to change fetchMultiExchangeRate
to be correctly typed as numbers, but it spilled over to here as well.
-
Crypto compare returns everything as numbers:
https://min-api.cryptocompare.com/data/pricemulti?fsyms=BTC,ETH&tsyms=USD,EUR
{"BTC":{"USD":65834.86,"EUR":60972.28},"ETH":{"USD":2415.39,"EUR":2232.75}}
-
The
fetchMultiExchangeRate
function keeps them as numbers:
- They're still numbers when
RatesController
is saving them to state:
- And they're still numbers when I export state from MM extension.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason why these are string
s is that converting to number
loses precision and can change the value in the conversion to an IEEE 754 float.
JSON itself allows numbers with arbitrary precision and does not consider the specifics of JavaScript.
Downcasting to JS number
(which is done internally by JSON.parse
) is in general not safe and can produce incorrect results, where in particular for exchange rates loss of precision compound as values get multiplied and result in inaccuracies.
This is the reason why we should:
- use some decimal/bignumber implementation when calculating on these values
- not serialize them as
number
- prefer
string
when serializing for public APIs
- prefer
- when deserializing JSON containing numbers, either:
- (preferred) use a different implementation than
JSON.parse
which does not destroy precision - transform the raw JSON string before desiralization, wrapping numbers to strings with
"
so they can be safely deserialized usingJSON.parse
- (preferred) use a different implementation than
- In general avoid treating them as
number
ever
Even if at some point we end up being forced to use number
at some API endpoint for whatever reason, those should be contained.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
More on the same:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47916160/alternative-to-json-parse-for-maintaining-decimal-precision/47916876#47916876
https://0.30000000000000004.com/
Why the PayPal API uses strings:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35709595/why-would-you-use-a-string-in-json-to-represent-a-decimal-number
https://blog.phakorn.com/jsons-numeric-boundaries-the-lesser-known-reality-of-inaccurate-figures
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That all makes sense. I know that was the intent of typing these as string. But it's not what actually happens today given we're using Response.json()
which puts them into numbers. I think the types should accurately reflect that in the meantime.
Filed this to track it. #4857. The wallets consuming this state would also need to stop expecting numbers.
Would it be viable to make the public API less tightly coupled to Crypto Compare API? Would make it less involved to make future changes and make it more flexible and robust at the same time. Related: https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/4852/files#r1817508642 |
Can you explain what you're thinking? The crypto compare stuff is already behind a separate service with generic interfaces for |
@metamaskbot publish-preview |
Preview builds have been published. See these instructions for more information about preview builds. Expand for full list of packages and versions.
|
## **Description** Leverages MetaMask/core#4852 to fetch native currency prices across all evm chains, instead of just the current chain. Metamask will now hit the `/pricemulti` endpoint of cryptocompare to fetch an array of currencies in 1 request. [![Open in GitHub Codespaces](https://github.com/codespaces/badge.svg)](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/28196?quickstart=1) ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** No user facing changes. 1. Add some networks with native currencies other than ETH like polygon, bnb 2. Verify native tokens have the correct fiat price 3. Export state and verify `currencyRates` has entries for each native currency ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <[email protected]>
Explanation
Updates the currency rate controller to use the
pricemulti
endpoint of crypto compare. This allows us to fetch exchange rates for multiple native currencies in a single http request.References
Changelog
@metamask/assets-controllers
CurrencyRateController
now accepts an array of native currencies as its polling input.RatesController
now types theconversionRate
andusdConversionRate
in its state asnumber
instead ofstring
, to match what it was actually storing.Checklist