Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Model Variable Naming Sprint: Part 5 #226

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

ss421
Copy link
Contributor

@ss421 ss421 commented Oct 7, 2024

Description

Part of https://github.com/JCSDA-internal/oops/issues/2737

Renames the following variables:

  • surface_pressure -> air_pressure_at_surface
  • height -> height_above_mean_sea_level
  • height_levels -> height_above_mean_sea_level_levels
  • height_levels_minus_one -> height_above_mean_sea_level_levels_minus_one
  • surface_altitude -> height_above_mean_sea_level_at_surface

Dependencies

build-group=https://github.com/JCSDA-internal/vader/pull/274
build-group=https://github.com/JCSDA-internal/saber/pull/947
build-group=https://github.com/JCSDA-internal/ufo/pull/3476
build-group=JCSDA-internal/ufo-data#449

To be merged with this PR

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have run the unit tests before creating the PR

@ss421 ss421 self-assigned this Oct 7, 2024
@mikecooke77
Copy link
Collaborator

All I have done is take the code you have already updated and run:

python generate_unittest_netcdfs.py

This creates all the test files used by opsinputs. So even if they haven't changed they are recreated which I think is OK.

@mikecooke77
Copy link
Collaborator

This is now passing locally for me

Copy link
Collaborator

@ctgh ctgh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look good to me (although the CI is still failing).

@mikecooke77 mikecooke77 merged commit 43c63b1 into develop Oct 8, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@mikecooke77 mikecooke77 deleted the feature/variable_names_part5 branch October 8, 2024 17:06
@yaswant
Copy link
Collaborator

yaswant commented Oct 8, 2024

@mikecooke77 - I think you can remove the ready-to-merge workflow from CI. It appears to confuse many rather than adding any value to the review process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants