-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 291
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#5811 Some validation rules and illegal design quirk #5828
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5828 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 29.06% 29.05% -0.01%
+ Complexity 13911 13895 -16
============================================
Files 2507 2507
Lines 266343 266380 +37
Branches 47612 47628 +16
============================================
- Hits 77400 77394 -6
- Misses 185021 185045 +24
- Partials 3922 3941 +19 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
As mentioned in #5811 (comment), the RISC Hyper Laser is another piece of equipment that should require a nuclear engine. Could you add a check for that as well? IO:AE p87 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have the horrific drawbacks that come with the Illegal Design quirk?
|
TestMech already contains a test for the RHL. I didn't try it out. I suppose you tried it and it validated? |
I tried it with an ICE vehicle and MML said it was valid. Maybe it only checks it on mechs or something like that? |
Fixes #5811