Fix bug due to poor naming of QResources attribute

[gpetretto]

The kwargs attribute of QResources is not handled correctly by monty during serialization.
Renaming it to qkwargs

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (f960941) 62.43% compared to head (f7c8df1) 43.35%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Current head f7c8df1 differs from pull request most recent head 3c2ab3d. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3c2ab3d to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop      #32       +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage    62.43%   43.35%   -19.09%     
============================================
  Files           15       15               
  Lines         1118     1128       +10     
  Branches       216      222        +6     
============================================
- Hits           698      489      -209     
- Misses         418      611      +193     
- Partials         2       28       +26     

Files	Coverage Δ
src/qtoolkit/core/data_objects.py	84.75% <100.00%> (-15.25%)	⬇️
src/qtoolkit/io/pbs.py	19.90% <0.00%> (ø)
src/qtoolkit/io/slurm.py	22.13% <0.00%> (-55.18%)	⬇️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

[davidwaroquiers]

Good to me except (maybe) for naming ? (see line comments) I let you decide if you think qkwargs is fine or else, it is not a super crucial point anyway.

[davidwaroquiers]

All good to me!
About the timedelta, in the end I guess you went with removing it then? (if we see a need in future, we can also add it again)
Can be merged!

[gpetretto]

Yes, I also removed the timedelta type for time_limit. Adding it back with a better support will be possible at a later time.