-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor readers v #247
base: refactor_readers_IV
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Refactor readers v #247
Conversation
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
@@ -212,7 +212,6 @@ library_reader_base: | |||
reader_type: library_reader_base | |||
rt_unit: irt | |||
fixed_C57: False | |||
csv_sep: "\t" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We already used "on-the-fly" sep detecting, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, this seemed to be just a leftover (wasn't used)
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ | |||
"""Module to handle modification mappings for different search engines.""" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea!!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
move all modification mapping-related logic to a dedicated class