Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hexagon-dsp-binaries: bump the version #699

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lumag
Copy link
Collaborator

@lumag lumag commented Dec 11, 2024

Bump the version of the Hexagon DSP binaries package to keep it 1:1 to the linux-firmware packaege version. This depends on OE-Core patches.

Bump the version of the Hexagon DSP binaries package to keep it 1:1
to the linux-firmware packaege version.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>
@lumag lumag marked this pull request as ready for review December 13, 2024 04:43
@lumag
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lumag commented Dec 13, 2024

cc @ndechesne @ricardosalveti

@ndechesne
Copy link
Contributor

Why do you need this tight coupling? are you going to update the filename each time linux-firmware in OE changes? does that really make sense?

@lumag
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lumag commented Dec 13, 2024

Unfortunately the DSP binaries are tied to the particular DSP firmware. So, we have to make sure that their versions match. The easiest way to handle that is by versioned RDEPENDS from DSP package onto the corresponding linux-firmware package.
So, basically yes. Another option might be to make linux-firmware-qcom-foo provide crafted virtual packages like sm8250-qualcomm-rb5-ADSP.HT.5.3.c2-00082-SM8250-1 and then make Hexagon DSP binaries package depend on such virtual name. However such a dependency quickly becomes distro-specific and can not be easily automated. So, it seems, just forcing 1:1 version dependency is the easiest way to handle the issue in a generic way.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants