s5cmd
is a very fast S3 and local filesystem execution tool. It comes with support
for a multitude of operations including tab completion and wildcard support
for files, which can be very handy for your object storage workflow while working
with large number of files.
There are already other utilities to work with S3 and similar object storage
services, thus it is natural to wonder what s5cmd
has to offer that others don't.
In short, s5cmd
offers a very fast speed.
Thanks to Joshua Robinson for his
study and experimentation on s5cmd;
to quote his medium post:
For uploads, s5cmd is 32x faster than s3cmd and 12x faster than aws-cli. For downloads, s5cmd can saturate a 40Gbps link (~4.3 GB/s), whereas s3cmd and aws-cli can only reach 85 MB/s and 375 MB/s respectively.
If you would like to know more about performance of s5cmd
and the
reasons for its fast speed, refer to benchmarks section
s5cmd
supports wide range of object management tasks both for cloud
storage services and local filesystems.
- List buckets and objects
- Upload, download or delete objects
- Move, copy or rename objects
- Set Server Side Encryption using AWS Key Management Service (KMS)
- Set Access Control List (ACL) for objects/files on the upload, copy, move.
- Print object contents to stdout
- Select JSON records from objects using SQL expressions
- Create or remove buckets
- Summarize objects sizes, grouping by storage class
- Wildcard support for all operations
- Multiple arguments support for delete operation
- Command file support to run commands in batches at very high execution speeds
- Dry run support
- S3 Transfer Acceleration support
- Google Cloud Storage (and any other S3 API compatible service) support
- Structured logging for querying command outputs
- Shell auto-completion
The Releases page provides pre-built binaries for Linux, macOS and Windows.
For macOS, a homebrew tap is provided:
brew tap peak/s5cmd https://github.com/peak/s5cmd
brew install s5cmd
You can also install s5cmd
from MacPorts on macOS:
sudo port selfupdate
sudo port install s5cmd
NOTE: MacPorts is not officially supported. The versions might be out of date compared to Homebrew.
You can build s5cmd
from source if you have Go 1.14+
installed.
go get github.com/peak/s5cmd
master
is not guaranteed to be stable since
development happens on master
branch.
$ docker pull peakcom/s5cmd
$ docker run --rm -v ~/.aws:/root/.aws peakcom/s5cmd <S3 operation>
$ git clone https://github.com/peak/s5cmd && cd s5cmd
$ docker build -t s5cmd .
$ docker run --rm -v ~/.aws:/root/.aws s5cmd <S3 operation>
s5cmd
supports multiple-level wildcards for all S3 operations. This is
achieved by listing all S3 objects with the prefix up to the first wildcard,
then filtering the results in-memory. For example, for the following command;
s5cmd cp 's3://bucket/logs/2020/03/*' .
first a ListObjects
request is send, then the copy operation will be executed
against each matching object, in parallel.
s5cmd cp s3://bucket/object.gz .
Suppose we have the following objects:
s3://bucket/logs/2020/03/18/file1.gz
s3://bucket/logs/2020/03/19/file2.gz
s3://bucket/logs/2020/03/19/originals/file3.gz
s5cmd cp 's3://bucket/logs/2020/03/*' logs/
s5cmd
will match the given wildcards and arguments by doing an efficient
search against the given prefixes. All matching objects will be downloaded in
parallel. s5cmd
will create the destination directory if it is missing.
logs/
directory content will look like:
$ tree
.
└── logs
├── 18
│ └── file1.gz
└── 19
├── file2.gz
└── originals
└── file3.gz
4 directories, 3 files
ℹ️ s5cmd
preserves the source directory structure by default. If you want to
flatten the source directory structure, use the --flatten
flag.
s5cmd cp --flatten 's3://bucket/logs/2020/03/*' logs/
logs/
directory content will look like:
$ tree
.
└── logs
├── file1.gz
├── file2.gz
└── file3.gz
1 directory, 3 files
s5cmd cp object.gz s3://bucket/
by setting server side encryption (aws kms) of the file:
s5cmd cp -sse aws:kms -sse-kms-key-id <your-kms-key-id> object.gz s3://bucket/
by setting Access Control List (acl) policy of the object:
s5cmd cp -acl bucket-owner-full-control object.gz s3://bucket/
s5cmd cp directory/ s3://bucket/
Will upload all files at given directory to S3 while keeping the folder hierarchy of the source.
s5cmd rm s3://bucket/logs/2020/03/18/file1.gz
s5cmd rm s3://bucket/logs/2020/03/19/*
Will remove all matching objects:
s3://bucket/logs/2020/03/19/file2.gz
s3://bucket/logs/2020/03/19/originals/file3.gz
s5cmd
utilizes S3 delete batch API. If matching objects are up to 1000,
they'll be deleted in a single request. However, it should be noted that commands such as
s5cmd rm s3://bucket-foo/object s3://bucket-bar/object
are not supported by s5cmd
and result in error (since we have 2 different buckets), as it is in odds with the benefit of performing batch delete requests. Thus, if in need, one can use s5cmd run
mode for this case, i.e,
$ s5cmd run
rm s3://bucket-foo/object
rm s3://bucket-bar/object
more details and examples on s5cmd run
are presented in a later section.
s5cmd
supports copying objects on the server side as well.
s5cmd cp 's3://bucket/logs/2020/*' s3://bucket/logs/backup/
Will copy all the matching objects to the given S3 prefix, respecting the source folder hierarchy.
s5cmd
supports the SelectObjectContent
S3 operation, and will run your
SQL query
against objects matching normal wildcard syntax and emit matching JSON records via stdout. Records
from multiple objects will be interleaved, and order of the records is not guaranteed (though it's
likely that the records from a single object will arrive in-order, even if interleaved with other
records).
$ s5cmd select --compression GZIP \
--query "SELECT s.timestamp, s.hostname FROM S3Object s WHERE s.ip_address LIKE '10.%' OR s.application='unprivileged'" \
s3://bucket-foo/object/2021/*
{"timestamp":"2021-07-08T18:24:06.665Z","hostname":"application.internal"}
{"timestamp":"2021-07-08T18:24:16.095Z","hostname":"api.github.com"}
At the moment this operation only supports JSON records selected with SQL. S3 calls this lines-type JSON, but it seems that it works even if the records aren't line-delineated. YMMV.
$ s5cmd du --humanize 's3://bucket/2020/*'
30.8M bytes in 3 objects: s3://bucket/2020/*
The most powerful feature of s5cmd
is the commands file. Thousands of S3 and
filesystem commands are declared in a file (or simply piped in from another
process) and they are executed using multiple parallel workers. Since only one
program is launched, thousands of unnecessary fork-exec calls are avoided. This
way S3 execution times can reach a few thousand operations per second.
s5cmd run commands.txt
or
cat commands.txt | s5cmd run
commands.txt
content could look like:
cp s3://bucket/2020/03/* logs/2020/03/
# line comments are supported
rm s3://bucket/2020/03/19/file2.gz
# empty lines are OK too like above
# rename an S3 object
mv s3://bucket/2020/03/18/file1.gz s3://bucket/2020/03/18/original/file.gz
# list all buckets
ls # inline comments are OK too
sync
command synchronizes S3 buckets, prefixes, directories and files between S3 buckets and prefixes as well.
It compares files between source and destination, taking source files as source-of-truth;
- copies files those do not exist in destination
- copies files those exist in both locations if the comparison made with sync strategy allows it so
It makes a one way synchronization from source to destination without modifying any of the source files and deleting any of the destination files (unless --delete
flag has passed).
Suppose we have following files;
- 29 Sep 10:00 .
5000 29 Sep 11:00 ├── favicon.ico
300 29 Sep 10:00 ├── index.html
50 29 Sep 10:00 ├── readme.md
80 29 Sep 11:30 └── styles.css
s5cmd ls s3://bucket/static/
2021/09/29 10:00:01 300 index.html
2021/09/29 11:10:01 10 readme.md
2021/09/29 10:00:01 90 styles.css
2021/09/29 11:10:01 10 test.html
running would;
- copy
favicon.ico
- file does not exist in destination.
- copy
styles.css
- source file is newer than to remote counterpart.
- copy
readme.md
- even though the source one is older, it's size differs from the destination one; assuming source file is the source of truth.
s5cmd sync . s3://bucket/static/
cp favicon.ico s3://bucket/static/favicon.ico
cp styles.css s3://bucket/static/styles.css
cp readme.md s3://bucket/static/readme.md
Running with --delete
flag would delete files those do not exist in the source;
s5cmd sync --delete . s3://bucket/static/
rm s3://bucket/test.html
cp favicon.ico s3://bucket/static/favicon.ico
cp styles.css s3://bucket/static/styles.css
cp readme.md s3://bucket/static/readme.md
It's also possible to use wildcards to sync only a subset of files.
To sync only .html
files in S3 bucket above to same local file system;
s5cmd sync 's3://bucket/static/*.html' .
cp s3://bucket/prefix/index.html index.html
cp s3://bucket/prefix/test.html test.html
By default s5cmd
compares files' both size and modification times, treating source files as source of truth. Any difference in size or modification time would cause s5cmd
to copy source object to destination.
mod time | size | should sync |
---|---|---|
src > dst | src != dst | ✅ |
src > dst | src == dst | ✅ |
src <= dst | src != dst | ✅ |
src <= dst | src == dst | ❌ |
With --size-only
flag, it's possible to use the strategy that would only compare file sizes. Source treated as source of truth and any difference in sizes would cause s5cmd
to copy source object to destination.
mod time | size | should sync |
---|---|---|
src > dst | src != dst | ✅ |
src > dst | src = dst | ❌ |
src <= dst | src != dst | ✅ |
src <= dst | src == dst | ❌ |
--dry-run
flag will output what operations will be performed without actually
carrying out those operations.
s3://bucket/pre/file1.gz
...
s3://bucket/last.txt
running
s5cmd --dry-run cp s3://bucket/pre/* s3://another-bucket/
will output
cp s3://bucket/pre/file1.gz s3://another-bucket/file1.gz
...
cp s3://bucket/pre/last.txt s3://anohter-bucket/last.txt
however, those copy operations will not be performed. It is displaying what
s5cmd
will do when ran without --dry-run
Note that --dry-run
can be used with any operation that has a side effect, i.e.,
cp, mv, rm, mb ...
s5cmd
uses official AWS SDK to access S3. SDK requires credentials to sign
requests to AWS. Credentials can be provided in a variety of ways:
- Environment variables
- AWS credentials file, including profile selection via
AWS_PROFILE
environment variable - If
s5cmd
runs on an Amazon EC2 instance, EC2 IAM role - If
s5cmd
runs on EKS, Kube IAM role
The SDK detects and uses the built-in providers automatically, without requiring manual configurations.
While executing the commands, s5cmd
detects the region according to the following order of priority:
--source-region
or--destination-region
flags ofcp
command.AWS_REGION
environment variable.- Region section of AWS profile.
- Auto detection from bucket region (via
HeadBucket
). us-east-1
as default region.
Shell completion is supported for bash, zsh and fish.
To enable auto-completion, run:
s5cmd --install-completion
This will add a few lines to your shell configuration file. After installation, restart your shell to activate the changes.
s5cmd
supports S3 API compatible services, such as GCS, Minio or your favorite
object storage.
s5cmd --endpoint-url https://storage.googleapis.com ls
or an alternative with environment variable
S3_ENDPOINT_URL="https://storage.googleapis.com" s5cmd ls
# or
export S3_ENDPOINT_URL="https://storage.googleapis.com"
s5cmd ls
all variants will return your GCS buckets.
s5cmd
will use virtual-host style bucket resolving for S3, S3 transfer
acceleration and GCS. If a custom endpoint is provided, it'll fallback to
path-style.
s5cmd
uses an exponential backoff retry mechanism for transient or potential
server-side throttling errors. Non-retriable errors, such as invalid credentials
, authorization errors
etc, will not be retried. By default,
s5cmd
will retry 10 times for up to a minute. Number of retries are adjustable
via --retry-count
flag.
ℹ️ Enable debug level logging for displaying retryable errors.
Most shells can attempt to expand wildcards before passing the arguments to
s5cmd
, resulting in surprising no matches found
errors.
To avoid this problem, surround the wildcarded expression with single quotes.
s5cmd
supports both structured and unstructured outputs.
- unstructured output
$ s5cmd cp s3://bucket/testfile .
cp s3://bucket/testfile testfile
$ s5cmd cp --no-clobber s3://somebucket/file.txt file.txt
ERROR "cp s3://somebucket/file.txt file.txt": object already exists
- If
--json
flag is provided:
{
"operation": "cp",
"success": true,
"source": "s3://bucket/testfile",
"destination": "testfile",
"object": "[object]"
}
{
"operation": "cp",
"job": "cp s3://somebucket/file.txt file.txt",
"error": "'cp s3://somebucket/file.txt file.txt': object already exists"
}
Some benchmarks regarding the performance of s5cmd
are introduced below. For more
details refer to this post
which is the source of the benchmarks to be presented.
Upload/download of single large file
Uploading large number of small-sized files
Performance comparison on different hardware
So, where does all this speed come from?
There are mainly two reasons for this:
- It is written in Go, a statically compiled language designed to make development of concurrent systems easy and make full utilization of multi-core processors.
- Parallelization.
s5cmd
starts out with concurrent worker pools and parallelizes workloads as much as possible while trying to achieve maximum throughput.
Some of the advanced usage patterns provided below are inspired by the following article (thank you! @joshuarobinson)
Assume we have a set of objects on S3, and we would like to list them in sorted fashion according to object names.
$ s5cmd ls s3://bucket/reports/ | sort -k 4
2020/08/17 09:34:33 1364 antalya.csv
2020/08/17 09:34:33 0 batman.csv
2020/08/17 09:34:33 23114 istanbul.csv
2020/08/17 09:34:33 26154 izmir.csv
2020/08/17 09:34:33 112 samsun.csv
2020/08/17 09:34:33 12552 van.csv
For a more practical scenario, let's say we have an avocado prices dataset, and we would like to take a peek at the few lines of the data by fetching only the necessary bytes.
$ s5cmd cat s3://bucket/avocado.csv.gz | gunzip | xsv slice --len 5 | xsv table
Date AveragePrice Total Volume 4046 4225 4770 Total Bags Small Bags Large Bags XLarge Bags type year region
0 2015-12-27 1.33 64236.62 1036.74 54454.85 48.16 8696.87 8603.62 93.25 0.0 conventional 2015 Albany
1 2015-12-20 1.35 54876.98 674.28 44638.81 58.33 9505.56 9408.07 97.49 0.0 conventional 2015 Albany
2 2015-12-13 0.93 118220.22 794.7 109149.67 130.5 8145.35 8042.21 103.14 0.0 conventional 2015 Albany
3 2015-12-06 1.08 78992.15 1132.0 71976.41 72.58 5811.16 5677.4 133.76 0.0 conventional 2015 Albany
4 2015-11-29 1.28 51039.6 941.48 43838.39 75.78 6183.95 5986.26 197.69 0.0 conventional 2015 Albany
s5cmd
allows to pass in some file, containing list of operations to be performed, as an argument to the run
command as illustrated in the above example. Alternatively, one can pipe in commands into
the run:
BUCKET=s5cmd-test; s5cmd ls s3://$BUCKET/*test | grep -v DIR | awk ‘{print $NF}’
| xargs -I {} echo “cp s3://$BUCKET/{} /local/directory/” | s5cmd run
The above command performs two s5cmd
invocations; first, searches for files with test suffix and then creates a copy to local directory command for each matching file and finally, pipes in those into the run.
Let's examine another usage instance, where we migrate files older than 30 days to a cloud object storage:
find /mnt/joshua/nachos/ -type f -mtime +30 | awk '{print "mv "$1" s3://joshuarobinson/backup/"$1}'
| s5cmd run
It is worth to mention that, run
command should not be considered as a silver bullet for all operations. For example, assume we want to remove the following objects:
s3://bucket/prefix/2020/03/object1.gz
s3://bucket/prefix/2020/04/object1.gz
...
s3://bucket/prefix/2020/09/object77.gz
Rather than executing
rm s3://bucket/prefix/2020/03/object1.gz
rm s3://bucket/prefix/2020/04/object1.gz
...
rm s3://bucket/prefix/2020/09/object77.gz
with run
command, it is better to just use
rm s3://bucket/prefix/2020/0*/object*.gz
the latter sends single delete request per thousand objects, whereas using the former approach
sends a separate delete request for each subcommand provided to run.
Thus, there can be a
significant runtime difference between those two approaches.
MIT. See LICENSE.