-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update abvar page #6196
Update abvar page #6196
Conversation
I'm wondering if it is potentially confusing to have the "hence it is principally polarizable" after "it contains X hyperelliptic Jacobians", since the "hence" is independent of "hyperelliptic". It might be clearer to make the the statement about containing (any sort of) Jacobian, hence PPAV first, then say how many are hyperelliptic. |
I tried rewording it; let me know if you think the new version is an improvement (it's a bit wordier). |
Hmm, the statements still seem to have the form "This isogeny class contains the Jacobian of X hyperelliptic curves, hence is principally polarizable, ...", which doesn't address the issue I was concerned about. How about "This isogeny class is principally polarizable and contains the Jacobian of X hyperelliptic curves, ...". I guess we are happy to call an isogeny class principally polarizable if it contains a principally polarizable AV (this is already implicit in the current wording). |
@AndrewVSutherland, I've made the change you suggested. I also added more features, so this now fixes #3310 (by adding new entries to the top of the browse page), adds a bunch of hidden search columns and several new sort orders. |
To test, look at the browse page and play around with search columns and sort orders in abelian variety search results. Before this is merged, we should push |
Looks good, and I see that @edgarcosta copied av_fq_isog to proddb. |
to show info when
hyp_count
is known but notjacobian_count
. To test, compare